Endmill Geometry

Computer Numeric Control - All aspects of Computer Numeric Control - machinery as well as software 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Endmill Geometry Rob Hammond 02-04-2009
Posted by Rob Hammond on February 4, 2009, 7:39 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Hi all

For endmills such as

http://www.maford.com/pdf/Metric XR 07.pdf

(177 series) which are 4 flute and centre cutting (as I understand it) why
is there no capability of simple Z plunge 'drilling'? Or ramping at greater
than 7 degrees?

And if I'm to circular interpolate at 7 degree ramp is it only necessary to
consider the circumference-path traced out by the tool centre and the Z
depth per revolution ..... or is it more complicated than that ? :)

Thanks
Rob

Posted by Bipolar Bear on February 4, 2009, 9:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Hi all
>
> For endmills such as
>
> http://www.maford.com/pdf/Metric XR 07.pdf
>
> (177 series) which are 4 flute and centre cutting (as I understand it) why
> is there no capability of simple Z plunge 'drilling'? Or ramping at
greater
> than 7 degrees?
>

It will clog at the gashes because during a straight z axis plunge you are
generating a ribbon-shaped chip and routing it almost directly upwards into
a sharp-cornered dead-ended gullet area.

Better is to use a 2 flute and radius the gash as shown here:

http://tinyurl.com/cnfer9


Where possible, blending a raduised gash into an exagerated secondary axial
end clearance provides the best roll-out action on straight plunge.



>
> And if I'm to circular interpolate at 7 degree ramp is it only necessary
to
> consider the circumference-path traced out by the tool centre and the Z
> depth per revolution ..... or is it more complicated than that ? :)
>

Ideally where ramping a helical path I like the hole to be larger than the
tool by at least 1x the tool radius but YMMV

--



Posted by Rob on February 5, 2009, 8:52 am
Please log in for more thread options


OK thanks.

If I'm using a 10mm endmill to ci a 22mm hole (giving a 38mm circumference
traced out by the tool centre)

Then will the max Z increment per revolution be 38 x sin7 = 4.6mm ??

4.6mm is much more than the local rep recommended!

Material: mild steel



Rob.





It will clog at the gashes because during a straight z axis plunge you are
generating a ribbon-shaped chip and routing it almost directly upwards into
a sharp-cornered dead-ended gullet area.


Posted by J. Nielsen on February 5, 2009, 10:55 am
Please log in for more thread options
On 5 Feb 2009 13:52:59 GMT, rob_remove_@vici.demon.co.uk (Rob) wrote:

>If I'm using a 10mm endmill to ci a 22mm hole (giving a 38mm circumference
>traced out by the tool centre)
>
>Then will the max Z increment per revolution be 38 x sin7 = 4.6mm ??
>
>4.6mm is much more than the local rep recommended!

You should always use the inner circumference, or the circumference of any
pre-drilled hole when calculating the feed. Remember, drilling is by far the
fastest way to remove the center of a hole.
--

-JN-

Similar ThreadsPosted
Endmill Experiment April 23, 2009, 12:03 am
Found a good endmill maker November 10, 2008, 3:40 pm
DIY Induction heater for shrinker endmill holders? April 24, 2008, 3:41 am
1 inch helical indexable endmill cutting 1.75 deep slot in A36 plate December 10, 2008, 9:24 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap