I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool

Computer Numeric Control - All aspects of Computer Numeric Control - machinery as well as software 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
I Want An Easier, Faster, Better CAD Tool jon_banquer 07-02-2008
Posted by jon_banquer on July 2, 2008, 10:58 pm
Please log in for more thread options
You use no parametric-history based CAD product because it looks
intimidating.

You don't want a massive learning curve learning stuff that seems
stupid to you.

You realize that you don't want to waste hours using a rollback bar to
try and understand some pick your nose engineer's design intent just
so you can modify their solid model to machine it.

You have to work with other people solid models.

You have to work with non-native solid models.

You use Mastercam and realize you want more powerful CAD.

You have seen SolidWorks and don't wish to be a CAD expert.

You use SolidWorks and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.

You use Pro/E and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.

You use Surfcam and realize Surfcam CAD leaves a lot to be desired.

You use Featurecam and realize Featurecam CAD leaves a lot to be
desired.

You use Rhino and want a modeler that's much better for mechanical
modeling.

You use Mecsoft Visual Mill 6 and want a better CAD program.

You use an old version of BobCRAP, hang up on their telemarketers and
refuse to downgrade your old copy of BobCRAP to BobCRAP 2007 / V22 and
give these lying Scientologist slime balls another dime.

I have some good news for you:

I can show you a better way to model!





If you are in the following categories you're a brain dead idiot and I
can't help you:


You use AutoCAD and think 2D is good enough.

You use Gibbscam and think it's CAD and CAM are just fine and have no
clue that Mastercam X2 blows Gibbscam away in most areas.

You use BobCRAP 2007 / V22.

You use Alibre.

You think Matt Lombard is a genius and actually knows something about
manufacturing.

You think Franco Folini is a genius and actually knows something about
manufacturing.

You think Novedge actually adds value to the CADCAM products they
sell.

You think that CATIA is an affordable answer.

You think CATIA has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with Synchronous
Technology has.

You think SolidWorks has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with
Synchronous Technology has.


The Jon Banquer blog has linked to a new video which makes it very
clear how much better thought out Solid Edge with Synchronous
Technology is and how easier it is to model with their new tools.

http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA





Posted by phil scott on July 2, 2008, 11:35 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> You use no parametric-history based CAD product because it looks
> intimidating.
>
> You don't want a massive learning curve learning stuff that seems
> stupid to you.
>
> You realize that you don't want to waste hours using a rollback bar to
> try and understand some pick your nose engineer's design intent just
> so you can modify their solid model to machine it.
>
> You have to work with other people solid models.
>
> You have to work with non-native solid models.
>
> You use Mastercam and realize you want more powerful CAD.
>
> You have seen SolidWorks and don't wish to be a CAD expert.
>
> You use SolidWorks and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> You use Pro/E and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> You use Surfcam and realize Surfcam CAD leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> You use Featurecam and realize Featurecam CAD leaves a lot to be
> desired.
>
> You use Rhino and want a modeler that's much better for mechanical
> modeling.
>
> You use Mecsoft Visual Mill 6 and want a better CAD program.
>
> You use an old version of BobCRAP, hang up on their telemarketers and
> refuse to downgrade your old copy of BobCRAP to BobCRAP 2007 / V22 and
> give these lying Scientologist slime balls another dime.

WhAt? culties produced bobCRAP... you know they are in bed with
both the business end and covert ops end of the CIA as well.

Phil scott

>
> I have some good news for you:
>
> I can show you a better way to model!
>
> If you are in the following categories you're a brain dead idiot and I
> can't help you:
>
> You use AutoCAD and think 2D is good enough.
>
> You use Gibbscam and think it's CAD and CAM are just fine and have no
> clue that Mastercam X2 blows Gibbscam away in most areas.
>
> You use BobCRAP 2007 / V22.
>
> You use Alibre.
>
> You think Matt Lombard is a genius and actually knows something about
> manufacturing.
>
> You think Franco Folini is a genius and actually knows something about
> manufacturing.
>
> You think Novedge actually adds value to the CADCAM products they
> sell.
>
> You think that CATIA is an affordable answer.
>
> You think CATIA has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with Synchronous
> Technology has.
>
> You think SolidWorks has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with
> Synchronous Technology has.
>
> The Jon Banquer blog has linked to a new video which makes it very
> clear how much better thought out Solid Edge with Synchronous
> Technology is and how easier it is to model with their new tools.
>
> http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/
>
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego, CA


Posted by Proctologically Violated®© on July 2, 2008, 11:35 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> You use no parametric-history based CAD product because it looks
> intimidating.
>
> You don't want a massive learning curve learning stuff that seems
> stupid to you.
>
> You realize that you don't want to waste hours using a rollback bar to
> try and understand some pick your nose engineer's design intent just
> so you can modify their solid model to machine it.
>
> You have to work with other people solid models.
>
> You have to work with non-native solid models.
>
> You use Mastercam and realize you want more powerful CAD.
>
> You have seen SolidWorks and don't wish to be a CAD expert.
>
> You use SolidWorks and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> You use Pro/E and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> You use Surfcam and realize Surfcam CAD leaves a lot to be desired.
>
> You use Featurecam and realize Featurecam CAD leaves a lot to be
> desired.
>
> You use Rhino and want a modeler that's much better for mechanical
> modeling.
>
> You use Mecsoft Visual Mill 6 and want a better CAD program.
>
> You use an old version of BobCRAP, hang up on their telemarketers and
> refuse to downgrade your old copy of BobCRAP to BobCRAP 2007 / V22 and
> give these lying Scientologist slime balls another dime.
>
> I have some good news for you:
>
> I can show you a better way to model!
>
>
>
>
>
> If you are in the following categories you're a brain dead idiot and I
> can't help you:
>
>
> You use AutoCAD and think 2D is good enough.
>
> You use Gibbscam and think it's CAD and CAM are just fine and have no
> clue that Mastercam X2 blows Gibbscam away in most areas.
>
> You use BobCRAP 2007 / V22.
>
> You use Alibre.
>
> You think Matt Lombard is a genius and actually knows something about
> manufacturing.
>
> You think Franco Folini is a genius and actually knows something about
> manufacturing.
>
> You think Novedge actually adds value to the CADCAM products they
> sell.
>
> You think that CATIA is an affordable answer.
>
> You think CATIA has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with Synchronous
> Technology has.
>
> You think SolidWorks has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with
> Synchronous Technology has.
>
>
> The Jon Banquer blog has linked to a new video which makes it very
> clear how much better thought out Solid Edge with Synchronous
> Technology is and how easier it is to model with their new tools.

I've got an easy, fast, better tool for you.
Open wide, muthafucka, you don't want to chip your teeth.....
--
------
Mr. P.V.'d (formerly Droll Troll), Yonkers, NY

Sodomized by Congress, butt again...
But, Obama at least took me to the hospital!

entropic3.14decay at optonline2.718 dot net; remove pi and e to reply--ie,
all d'numbuhs




>
> http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/
>
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego, CA
>
>
>
>



Posted by jon_banquer on July 3, 2008, 12:00 am
Please log in for more thread options
You use no parametric-history based CAD product because it looks
intimidating.

You don't want a massive learning curve learning stuff that seems
stupid to you.

You realize that you don't want to waste hours using a rollback bar to
try and understand some pick your nose engineer's design intent just
so you can modify their solid model to machine it.

You have to work with other people solid models.

You have to work with non-native solid models.

You use Mastercam and realize you want more powerful CAD.

You have seen SolidWorks and don't wish to be a CAD expert.

You use SolidWorks and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.

You use Pro/E and realize it leaves a lot to be desired.

You use Surfcam and realize Surfcam CAD leaves a lot to be desired.

You use Featurecam and realize Featurecam CAD leaves a lot to be
desired.

You use Rhino and want a modeler that's much better for mechanical
modeling.

You use Mecsoft Visual Mill 6 and want a better CAD program.

You use an old version of BobCRAP, hang up on their telemarketers and
refuse to downgrade your old copy of BobCRAP to BobCRAP 2007 / V22 and
give these lying Scientologist slime balls another dime.

I have some good news for you:

I can show you a better way to model!

If you are in the following categories you're a brain dead idiot and I
can't help you:

You use AutoCAD and think 2D is good enough.

You use Gibbscam and think it's CAD and CAM are just fine and have no
clue that Mastercam X2 blows Gibbscam away in most areas.

You use BobCRAP 2007 / V22.

You use Alibre.

You think Matt Lombard is a genius and actually knows something about
manufacturing.

You think Franco Folini is a genius and actually knows something about
manufacturing.

You think Novedge actually adds value to the CADCAM products they
sell.

You think that CATIA is an affordable answer.

You think CATIA has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with Synchronous
Technology has.

You think SolidWorks has the equivalent of what Solid Edge with
Synchronous Technology has.

The Jon Banquer blog has linked to a new video which makes it very
clear how much better thought out Solid Edge with Synchronous
Technology is and how easier it is to model with their new tools.

http://jonbanquer.baywords.com/

Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA

Posted by DaisyFlower on July 3, 2008, 1:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options
You throw down all these people that you say don't know squat about
manufacturing, well neither does Stevie Wonder. Didn't stop him.

What do you know about design? Nothing. So why does anyone care what you
say about computer aided DESIGN software? Nobody does.

List your DESIGN jobs please?

Show examples of products you have DESIGNED?

Who cares about manufacturing? We pay for the chinese to know that, we
don't have to pay to subsidize american welfare recipients too.


Daisy.








































** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Similar ThreadsPosted
Control Chatter & Go Faster September 28, 2008, 8:07 pm
Re: Faster melting of polar ice September 24, 2009, 12:54 pm
Re: Faster melting of polar ice September 25, 2009, 6:10 am
Re: Faster melting of polar ice September 25, 2009, 7:19 am
Re: Faster melting of polar ice September 25, 2009, 7:26 am
Re: Faster melting of polar ice September 27, 2009, 9:10 am
Re: Solidworks vs AutoDesks Inventor pro 2008 version... It looks like SW is a lot more intuitive and easier to learn... is that true June 8, 2008, 8:34 pm
Tool holder run out. May 4, 2006, 2:32 pm
Precision tool August 17, 2006, 7:03 pm
Shopbot - toy or tool or somewhere in between? May 2, 2008, 2:36 am

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap