|
Posted by Randy on October 8, 2009, 8:32 am
Please log in for more thread options
I did just read that GM is recalling 1000 workers to restore the 2nd
shift at one of its plants. So thats a positive on C4C. However if
this is true, then people got ripped off.
Can anyone verify that the $4500 is taxable? I do know that dealers
were offering some big discounts to move cars, I was not shopping for
a new car, so I can't say what the deals were and if they went away
for the C4C deal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I THOUGHT FROM THE START THAT IT WAS ANOTHER GOVERNMENT SCAM BUT
WASN'T SMART ENOUGH TO DO THE MATH!!! WAY TO GO CONGRESS, YOU GOT US
AGAIN!~!!!
Subject: interesting choice of words
From a real "Car Guy" out in Los Angeles, CA.
______________________________________________________________
SO...you took FEDZILLA up on its offer of $4500. dollars to trade in
your old "Clunker" (interesting choice of words)? Well, let's see who
got the best of that "deal"...
If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you got $4500 off for an
apparent "savings" of $1000. You could have gotten $3,500 if you had
just traded the car in. So you really are $1,000 ahead (depending on
your clunker's value) at this point. Not too bad...
However, you WILL have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th
(something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30%
tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.
So, rather than save $1000, you will actually pay an extra $350. to
the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid
for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not
need, trading in a "clunker" that was costing you less to run than the
payments that you will now be making. Even if you save $1,000. dollars
a year in gas due to better mileage, you're still gonna be in the red
for five years....hello?
But wait, it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer.
For example, the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started,
every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the
goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for
$12,500. because competition was stiff due to poor sales from the
stalled economy.
When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and
instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000
more than you would have the month before. Honda, Toyota , and Kia
played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did. Now let's do
the math...
You traded in a car worth: $3500
You got a discount of: $4500
---------
Net so far +$1000
But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500
--------
Net so far: -$350 (that's minus...in the
red)
And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling
for the month before
----------
Net Loss: -$3350
We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax,
dealer prep, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along
with the Five years of interest on the car loan; but let's just stop
here while you kick yourself. Suffice it to say that those costs will
be much higher than any savings you get from "better mileage".
So who actually made out on the deal? FEDZILLA collected taxes on the
car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers
made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the
kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. Manufacturers
got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before.
Lots of good or repairable used cars got taken off the market, crushed
and sold as scrap metal to (ready for this?) CHINA! (Look it up...)
And the poor consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot
afford.
FEDZILLA'S merry men (who promised that people making less than
$250,000.. would pay "not one red cent more in taxes") will make
millions in new tax revenues after convincing Joe Consumer that he was
getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" In fact, Joe was
giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the
privilege. Chicago politics gone global...with an agenda.
If you find errors in this math, please let me know....being a simple
guy, I'm always willing to learn new things; and if you took
"advantage" of the Clunkers deal, I have some swamp land down in
Florida that's for sale...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thank You,
Randy
Remove 333 from email address to reply.
|
|
Posted by Cliff on October 10, 2009, 6:58 am
Please log in for more thread options
>I did just read that GM is recalling 1000 workers to restore the 2nd
>shift at one of its plants. So thats a positive on C4C. However if
>this is true, then people got ripped off.
>
>Can anyone verify that the $4500 is taxable? I do know that dealers
>were offering some big discounts to move cars, I was not shopping for
>a new car, so I can't say what the deals were and if they went away
>for the C4C deal.
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> I THOUGHT FROM THE START THAT IT WAS ANOTHER GOVERNMENT SCAM BUT
>WASN'T SMART ENOUGH TO DO THE MATH!!! WAY TO GO CONGRESS, YOU GOT US
>AGAIN!~!!!
>
>
>Subject: interesting choice of words
>
>
>From a real "Car Guy" out in Los Angeles, CA.
>
>______________________________________________________________
>
>SO...you took FEDZILLA up on its offer of $4500. dollars to trade in
>your old "Clunker" (interesting choice of words)? Well, let's see who
>got the best of that "deal"...
>
>If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you got $4500 off for an
>apparent "savings" of $1000. You could have gotten $3,500 if you had
>just traded the car in. So you really are $1,000 ahead (depending on
>your clunker's value) at this point. Not too bad...
>
>
>
>However, you WILL have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th
>(something that no auto dealer will tell you). If you are in the 30%
>tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500.
>
>
>
>So, rather than save $1000, you will actually pay an extra $350. to
>the feds. In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid
>for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not
>need, trading in a "clunker" that was costing you less to run than the
>payments that you will now be making. Even if you save $1,000. dollars
>a year in gas due to better mileage, you're still gonna be in the red
>for five years....hello?
>
>
>
>But wait, it gets even better: you also got ripped off by the dealer.
>For example, the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started,
>every dealer here in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the
>goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for
>$12,500. because competition was stiff due to poor sales from the
>stalled economy.
>
>
>
>When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and
>instead sold them at the list price of $15,500. So, you paid $3000
>more than you would have the month before. Honda, Toyota , and Kia
>played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did. Now let's do
>the math...
>
>You traded in a car worth: $3500
>
>You got a discount of: $4500
>
> ---------
>
>Net so far +$1000
>
>But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500
>
> --------
>
>Net so far: -$350 (that's minus...in the
>red)
>
>And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling
>for the month before
>
> ----------
>
>Net Loss: -$3350
>
>
>
>We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax,
>dealer prep, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along
>with the Five years of interest on the car loan; but let's just stop
>here while you kick yourself. Suffice it to say that those costs will
>be much higher than any savings you get from "better mileage".
>
>
>
>So who actually made out on the deal? FEDZILLA collected taxes on the
>car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" you. The car dealers
>made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the
>kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. Manufacturers
>got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before.
>Lots of good or repairable used cars got taken off the market, crushed
>and sold as scrap metal to (ready for this?) CHINA! (Look it up...)
>And the poor consumer got saddled with even more debt that they cannot
>afford.
>
>
>
>FEDZILLA'S merry men (who promised that people making less than
>$250,000.. would pay "not one red cent more in taxes") will make
>millions in new tax revenues after convincing Joe Consumer that he was
>getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" In fact, Joe was
>giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the
>privilege. Chicago politics gone global...with an agenda.
>
>
>
>If you find errors in this math, please let me know....being a simple
>guy, I'm always willing to learn new things; and if you took
>"advantage" of the Clunkers deal, I have some swamp land down in
>Florida that's for sale...
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
>
>Thank You,
>Randy
>
>Remove 333 from email address to reply.
Someone feeding you BS probably.
--
Cliff
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 3, 2009, 6:14 pm |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 4, 2009, 2:01 am |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 4, 2009, 7:45 am |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 4, 2009, 7:49 am |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 4, 2009, 12:59 pm |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 6, 2009, 10:25 am |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 6, 2009, 3:12 pm |
| Re: GOP could block clunkers cash | August 6, 2009, 3:41 pm |
| OT Cash for Clunkers peters out in two weeks | August 20, 2009, 12:44 am |
| #OT#: Results of "Cash for Clunkers" program | August 26, 2009, 2:10 pm |
|
|