|
Posted by jon_banquer on August 16, 2008, 12:42 am
Please log in for more thread options
> I got notice in email and posted it earlier, it was released today aug
> 15 at 2pm..
Thanks, Phil. I didn't really understand your other post and I really
appreciate this clarification.
I think both you and I are really going to enjoy Solid Edge with S/T.
If Siemens does a good job or marketing, Solid Edge with S/T is going
to radically change the market. If not, others will fill the vacuum.
You made a good choice and you can hold me to that as well. ;>)
Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
http://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
|
|
Posted by on August 16, 2008, 1:09 am
Please log in for more thread options On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:42:10 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
>
>I think both you and I are really going to enjoy Solid Edge with S/T.
You bought SolidEdge?
|
|
Posted by phil scott on August 16, 2008, 1:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options > > I got notice in email and posted it earlier, it was released today aug
> > 15 at 2pm..
>
> Thanks, Phil. I didn't really understand your other post and I really
> appreciate this clarification.
>
> I think both you and I are really going to enjoy Solid Edge with S/T.
> If Siemens does a good job or marketing, Solid Edge with S/T is going
> to radically change the market. If not, others will fill the vacuum.
I found IV one massive pain in the ass to learn and operate with...Im
sure its good for many things but most of us only use maybe 1% of such
capability, the rest just makes life way too complicated. SE plain
vanilla is about 1/4 as complex... my guess SW is also.
SE synch though if it works as advertized or even close will change a
lot of lives... even with some bugs and limitations I will probably
find it a small miracle for what I do. (no machining, no close
tolerances as a rule..just pipe, controls wiring, equipment component
drawings and equipment layout).. maybe for some of the complex
functions others deal with it will have issues.
>
> You made a good choice and you can hold me to that as well. ;>)
yes, thanks again for the tip.. it was a big deal for me on this
end. .Id bet it will be in my mail box by next week.
if its 100x easier/ faster than existing cad, just an hour or two on
the first tutorial will make that clear...I'll be effusive as hell
about SE if that turns out to be the case
Phil scott
>
> Jon Banquer
> San Diego, CAhttp://jonbanquer.blogspot.com/
|
|
Posted by Von Pearsall on August 16, 2008, 6:11 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:14:15 -0700 (PDT), phil scott
>
>>if its 100x easier/ faster than existing cad, just an hour or two on
>>the first tutorial will make that clear...I'll be effusive as hell
>>about SE if that turns out to be the case
>>
>>
>>Phil scott
>
> Phil,
>
> 100x easier/faster eh. Every time someone makes a boast like that
> first thing I do is give them one of my parts to draw, one I know how
> long it takes and see what happens.
>
> Give your SE VAR a mold or complex assembly to draw from scratch,
> something he hasn't seen (avoiding the canned demo), one that takes
> 100 hours to draw in another current mainstream popular CAD program,
> give him an hour! see what happens.....they will be back pedaling
> faster than you can say "missed release date".
>
> Tom
>
Tom,
He already said that that is not what he does. I think it is up to you
or Jon B to submit the mold to the var and see what happens.
I look forward to a report from Phil on how SE with ST works for him.
I also hope that there maybe some mold makers or multi axis guys out there
who use SE for complex solids who will report on how it works for them with
ST.
Von
|
|
Posted by on August 16, 2008, 8:34 pm
Please log in for more thread options wrote:
>Tom,
>
>He already said that that is not what he does.
For the example I said mold or complex assembly but it could be what
ever product Phil designs to check the 100x faster/better claim.
>I think it is up to you
>or Jon B to submit the mold to the var and see what happens.
It wouldn't mean anything to Phil if not used on his work. The mold
was a bad example from the beginning since ST as I understand it
doesn't work with surfaces.
>I look forward to a report from Phil on how SE with ST works for him.
>
>I also hope that there maybe some mold makers or multi axis guys out there
>who use SE for complex solids who will report on how it works for them with
>ST.
It is interesting to know what is delivered vs. hype, as others have
said if it's half as good it will be worth the money. However just
drawing or editing a part is a small portion of the total.
Tom
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: When Will Solid Edge With S/T Be Released? | August 16, 2008, 12:20 am |
| Re: When Will Solid Edge With S/T Be Released? | August 16, 2008, 4:28 pm |
| Re: When Will Solid Edge With S/T Be Released? | August 16, 2008, 9:25 pm |
| Releasing Solid Edge With ST | September 1, 2008, 4:19 pm |
| Re: Solid Edge or Synchronous Technology? | August 24, 2008, 11:43 pm |
| Re: Solid Edge or Synchronous Technology? | August 25, 2008, 6:41 pm |
| Solid Edge With ST Video Tutorials | July 16, 2009, 12:29 am |
| Solid Edge With Synchronous Technology-> 3D Stretching | May 22, 2008, 4:06 pm |
| Overview Of Solid Edge With Synchronous Technology | May 23, 2008, 9:52 am |
| How Live Rules In Solid Edge Work | June 21, 2008, 12:13 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> 15 at 2pm..