Calling all you chemists...

General Metalworking - All aspects of working with metal. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Calling all you chemists... Steve Lusardi 05-14-2008
Posted by Bruce in Bangkok on May 15, 2008, 6:26 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:40:21 +0200, "Steve Lusardi"

>Bruce,
>It is precisely Peggie's response that generated this query. I have spoken
>to her on the phone about this issue in February. Peggie does not know one
>stainless alloy from another and could not give me the precise circumstances
>that created this condition, nor could she identify the alloy used. I
>respect her knowledge immensely and do not doubt for a second that this
>occurred and is true, but I am faced with a dilemma and need to understand
>the corrosion risks better in order to mitigate those as well as possible,
>hence this query. Please note Spehro's response above. It verifies my
>initial response to Peggie's statement. There was something else going on.
>It could be this bacteria thing, but my best guess at the moment is
>stagnation, free oxygen deprivation and the resultant crevice corrosion was
>the culprit. In addition to this query, I sent a similar one to the valve
>manufacturer, but I have not yet received the response. Right now it looks
>like my solution to the dilemma is to double valve the holding tank exit
>line, first with plastic and secondly with 316L at the hull.
>Steve

It sounds to me as though you have an installation with a holding tank
and a thruhull pump out in a steel boat. If that is the situation I'd
plumb the thruhull with the hull/seawater in mind as the fittings will
have limited contact with sewage... assuming that you flush the lines
after pump out, and use plastic for the tank plumbing.

Even if you have a bowl to thruhull system, without a holding tank,
there is still limited contact of concentrated sewage with the
thruhull as you initially pump water and then when it is flushed
clean you usually flip the lever and pump until you have blown the
lines clear of liquid. Of course, there is some leakage back through
the joker valve so sea water seeps back but I'd guess that the
majority of the liquid in contact with the thruhull is going to be sea
water.

I'd guess that the other fellow's recommendation of 316L is probably
your best choice.

>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 17:47:45 +0200, "Steve Lusardi"
>>
>>>Will urine ie human waste corrode 316L valves and pipe? The question is
>>>asked because waste tanks are typically plastic, but Lloyds A1
>>>certification
>>>requires all through hull valves to be fire proof. Fireproof valves are
>>>typically 316L. I have purchased all my valves from the chemical industry.
>>>I
>>>have been told that urine will corrode 316 over time. I don't believe it.
>>>If
>>>316 is good enough for corrosives in industry, why would it not stand up
>>>to
>>>human waste? If anybody knows for sure, please let me know.
>>>Steve
>>>
>> There was a thread on rec.boats.cruising today in which a lady named
>> Peggie Hall states:
>>
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> SS fittings in the sanitation system plumbing??? Not a good choice,
>> 'cuz urine will corrode 'em. At least one trawler mfr who puts all
>> fittings on the top of the tank, with a pickup tube inside the tank on
>> the discharge (a great idea) used stainless fittings and pickup
>> tubes--a
>> VERY bad idea, 'cuz the tubes are corroding, even falling off in
>> pieces
>> inside the tank, in just a few years.
>>
>> --
>> Peggie
>> ----------
>> Peggie Hall
>> Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987
>> Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems
>> and
>> Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor"
>> http://shop.sailboatowners.com/boat_odors/
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Peggie has been posting on rbc for some years now and her posts have
>> always been logical and informative.
>>
>> You might try contacting her for additional information.
>>
>> Bruce-in-Bangkok
>> (correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom)
>

Bruce-in-Bangkok
(correct Address is bpaige125atgmaildotcom)

Posted by Jim Wilkins on May 15, 2008, 6:34 am
Please log in for more thread options
Nuclear subs have Titanium or K-500 Monel hull fittings. Are either of
these affordable for the rest of us?

Posted by Tom Gardner on May 14, 2008, 11:52 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Will urine ie human waste corrode 316L valves and pipe? The question is asked
> because waste tanks are typically plastic, but Lloyds A1 certification
> requires all through hull valves to be fire proof. Fireproof valves are
> typically 316L. I have purchased all my valves from the chemical industry. I
> have been told that urine will corrode 316 over time. I don't believe it. If
> 316 is good enough for corrosives in industry, why would it not stand up to
> human waste? If anybody knows for sure, please let me know.
> Steve
>

I think it depends on who's urine. Years ago, after a night of merriment, my
urine would eat holes in porcelain.



Posted by Steve Lusardi on May 15, 2008, 11:13 am
Please log in for more thread options
For all of you following this thread. The response from Sharpe Valves, maker
of these valves is below:
Steve, everything we have says that 316 SS gets an "Excellent" or "A" rating
when it comes to urine up to 140deg.F.

Thanks,

Pat

Thank you all for your help.

Steve

> Will urine ie human waste corrode 316L valves and pipe? The question is
> asked because waste tanks are typically plastic, but Lloyds A1
> certification requires all through hull valves to be fire proof. Fireproof
> valves are typically 316L. I have purchased all my valves from the
> chemical industry. I have been told that urine will corrode 316 over time.
> I don't believe it. If 316 is good enough for corrosives in industry, why
> would it not stand up to human waste? If anybody knows for sure, please
> let me know.
> Steve
>



Similar ThreadsPosted
don't amount the chemists officially, throw them legally August 12, 2007, 9:55 pm
while employments best ask demonstrations, the supervisions often survive during the strange chemists August 12, 2007, 10:24 pm
Calling Scott Logan November 17, 2006, 11:38 am
are you isolated, I mean, calling between instant productions August 12, 2007, 7:31 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap