"Fun with MOTs"

General Metalworking - All aspects of working with metal. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
"Fun with MOTs" Bob Engelhardt 06-22-2008
Posted by ff on June 24, 2008, 10:47 am
Please log in for more thread options

> This circuit is not a good design.
>
> 1. There is the obvious problem of the capacitor polarity being
> reversed.
>
> 2. The snubbers (D1-R2 & D2-R1) are suitable for a flyback
> circuit but not a push-pull circuit like this one is.
> Consider: When Q1 is saturated, Q2 is cutoff. Q1 pulls the
> voltage on the right primary connection to 3V (Ic=10A). The
> voltage on the left primary connection will be +21V.
> But D1-R2 shunts this to the 12V CT. 9V / 10ohms = 0.9A of
> wasted current. Good designs use RC combinations for snubbers.
>
> 3. C2 charges to 19.5V (21V - 1.5Vbe). When Q1 switches off
> this places -16.5V on it's base. The max spec for Vbe is -7V so
> the design far exceeds the 2N3055's ratings.
>
> 4. A collector current of 10A requires a base current of around 3A.
> Yet R4 limits it to (12V -1.5V) / 180ohms = 58mA.
>
> 5. There is no provision for a dead time. During switching Q2 must
> turn on before the base drive can be removed from Q1 to turn it off.
> This causes collector currents of both transistors to spike very high
> for
> a short time and is just piss poor design for high power inverter
> circuits.
>
> Art


Is that why this was posted in the comments section of that site?

"I built this and it immediately exploded the tantalum caps. They were
the exact value and voltage rating as those listed."



Posted by Artemus on June 24, 2008, 4:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>
> > This circuit is not a good design.
> >
> > 1. There is the obvious problem of the capacitor polarity being
> > reversed.
> >
> > 2. The snubbers (D1-R2 & D2-R1) are suitable for a flyback
> > circuit but not a push-pull circuit like this one is.
> > Consider: When Q1 is saturated, Q2 is cutoff. Q1 pulls the
> > voltage on the right primary connection to 3V (Ic=10A). The
> > voltage on the left primary connection will be +21V.
> > But D1-R2 shunts this to the 12V CT. 9V / 10ohms = 0.9A of
> > wasted current. Good designs use RC combinations for snubbers.
> >
> > 3. C2 charges to 19.5V (21V - 1.5Vbe). When Q1 switches off
> > this places -16.5V on it's base. The max spec for Vbe is -7V so
> > the design far exceeds the 2N3055's ratings.
> >
> > 4. A collector current of 10A requires a base current of around 3A.
> > Yet R4 limits it to (12V -1.5V) / 180ohms = 58mA.
> >
> > 5. There is no provision for a dead time. During switching Q2 must
> > turn on before the base drive can be removed from Q1 to turn it off.
> > This causes collector currents of both transistors to spike very high
> > for
> > a short time and is just piss poor design for high power inverter
> > circuits.
> >
> > Art
>
>
> Is that why this was posted in the comments section of that site?
>
> "I built this and it immediately exploded the tantalum caps. They were
> the exact value and voltage rating as those listed."
>
>

I didn't read the comments, but yes all polarized caps don't take kindly
to having reverse voltage applied to them.
art




Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap