|
Posted by Phil Kangas on March 17, 2008, 12:14 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Yah, this guy claims to have invented a new form of
generator and claims it is not a perpetual motion
device! I'm a skeptic but here is the link so you
can decide for yourself. I'm going to keep my wallet
in my pocket......phil
http://www.nullgrav.com/index.htm
--
The right of the people to keep and bear
arms shall not be infringed.
|
|
Posted by Carl on March 17, 2008, 11:30 am
Please log in for more thread options
> Yah, this guy claims to have invented a new form of
> generator and claims it is not a perpetual motion
> device! I'm a skeptic but here is the link so you
> can decide for yourself. I'm going to keep my wallet
> in my pocket......phil
>
> http://www.nullgrav.com/index.htm
>
> --
> The right of the people to keep and bear
> arms shall not be infringed.
This one sentence from the web site is enough, it's a perpetual motion
machine.
"which may produce far more energy than it consumes."
Carl Boyd (not Karl, Carl, the other Carl, or the other Carl's brother
Carl)
|
|
Posted by Ned Simmons on March 17, 2008, 1:46 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:30:58 -0700 (PDT), Carl
>> Yah, this guy claims to have invented a new form of
>> generator and claims it is not a perpetual motion
>> device! I'm a skeptic but here is the link so you
>> can decide for yourself. I'm going to keep my wallet
>> in my pocket......phil
>>
>> http://www.nullgrav.com/index.htm
>
>This one sentence from the web site is enough, it's a perpetual motion
>machine.
>"which may produce far more energy than it consumes."
Nah, it only claims it *may* be a perpetual motion machine.
Sounds like the inventor figures if he makes his claims vague enough
he *may* get away with all his investors' money. <g>
--
Ned Simmons
|
|
Posted by Ignoramus22030 on March 17, 2008, 1:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options > Yah, this guy claims to have invented a new form of
> generator and claims it is not a perpetual motion
> device! I'm a skeptic but here is the link so you
> can decide for yourself. I'm going to keep my wallet
> in my pocket......phil
>
> http://www.nullgrav.com/index.htm
They say it produces more energy that it consumes. :)
i
|
|
Posted by Leo Lichtman on March 17, 2008, 2:25 pm
Please log in for more thread options I have a system that you can build yourself, and it works just as well. You
hoist a series of rocks up a column, and then drop them, extracting energy
from them as they fall. Use materials you have available. The only thing
you will have to buy is the gravitational shield that I have for sale.
www.sucker?.com
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | electrical Q results. | January 7, 2007, 8:22 pm |
| OT Electrical question | March 15, 2007, 2:39 pm |
| Electrical (gen-set) question | September 17, 2007, 2:38 pm |
| Slightly OT, need some electrical help | January 4, 2008, 6:29 pm |
| Electrical Question | March 24, 2006, 12:16 am |
| My trailer's electrical box design | February 5, 2007, 12:25 am |
| Electrical Component Supplier | February 23, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| Gas welder electrical question | May 19, 2007, 7:50 pm |
| Welder/Electrical Giggles.... | July 26, 2007, 4:03 am |
| How do I use a Split bolt ? (electrical) | November 11, 2007, 11:28 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
> generator and claims it is not a perpetual motion
> device! I'm a skeptic but here is the link so you
> can decide for yourself. I'm going to keep my wallet
> in my pocket......phil
>
> http://www.nullgrav.com/index.htm
>
> --
> The right of the people to keep and bear
> arms shall not be infringed.