Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last

General Metalworking - All aspects of working with metal. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last F. George McDuffee 04-05-2008
Posted by Joseph Gwinn on April 10, 2008, 9:06 am
Please log in for more thread options

> >
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> >> > TNMG has a central hole, and perhaps a complex shape, while the BXA-16N
> >> > was designed for a simple flat triangle with perpendicular sides.
> >>
> >>         The BXA-16N has a flat screw which holds the anvil in place, and
> >> a clamp/chipbreaker which holds the insert in place. There is an
> >> alternate screw which has a cylindrical projection above the head if you
> >> really want to use the center hole -- but I haven't bothered using
> >> anything other than what came with the BXA-16N.
> >
> > OK.
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> >>         There are special shapes, such as the 55 degree diamond which
> >> does a better job of reaching into a narrow space, and can be set to
> >> both turn and face with the same setting -- just different faces of the
> >> insert. Some of these days I'll get a diamond holder to use with the
> >> PCD diamond holders which I already have (on non-ferrous metals only, of
> >> course).
> >
> > That raises a question: How do the triange inserts differ from the 80
> > degree inserts? I notice that Aloris offers holders for both, being the
> > 16 and 16N for triangles, and 12 and 12N for the 80-degree inserts. I
> > would guess that the 80 degree inserts are stronger.
>
>         I would expect so. A bit more difficulty working in deep
> corners, but stronger for harder materials. Not likely to be something
> which you need for hobby metalworking.

OK. Much as I suspected. If triangles were too weak, they wouldn't
dominate the catalogs.


>         Here is an example of a shank which would accept those inserts,
> but which is too big for our machines:
>
>         ebay 380015167655
>
> but the photos will show you what the clamp is like on those -- which
> use the pin-head screws.

Yes. I see that the pin sticks up above the top of the insert in this
example, and would interfere if used in a holder intended for a simple
flat triangle insert.


>         Beware that many have 1x1" square shanks and thus are poor
> choices for our machines. Look for 5/8" square shanks instead for our
> machines.

Or get the BXA-1S or BXA-2S holders, which accept 3/4" shanks.


>         This one is closer, with a 3/4" shank -- which can be milled
> down to 5/8" on a horizontal mill. Not as sure about a vertical mill,
> however. Of course, none of these are the straight-ahead ones which I
> got with 100 inserts each some years ago. The photo shows the clamp
> clearly, the head of the pin-head screw, and the anvil under the insert.
> These were found with a search for:
>
>         TNMG inserts carbide
>
> without bothering to specify the size.

I just did that search. Lots of inserts for sale, too. The sad thing
is that the insert codes are beginning to make sense to me.

Brothers Machinery, which is almost near me, also has boxes of inserts
for sale. As well as holders without end.


> >>         Other coatings are better to avoid gumming up with soft aluminum
> >> alloys. Stick with something like 6061T6 and you should not need them.
> >> Lubricate the 6061T6 with kerosene or WD-40 (whichever is more
> >> convenient to apply. ;-)
> >
> > On the mill and drill press, Rustlick WS-5050 works very well.
>
>         Good to know.
>
> >>         The BXA-16N and the inserts which I suggested are a good general
> >> purpose selection. Go with that -- and worry about others when you
> >> discover that you need them -- such as when turning a lot of already
> >> hardened 4140 for example. :-)
> >
> > OK. Although I may also get the alternate screw with pin.
>
>         O.K. But you really don't need it with the chipbreaker style
> clamp that the BXA-16N uses. Try the holder and inserts first and only
> if you have troubles bother to order the pin-head screws (whatever the
> actual vendors call them. :-)

OK.

Joe Gwinn

Posted by DoN. Nichols on April 10, 2008, 8:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>

        [ ... ]

>> > That raises a question: How do the triange inserts differ from the 80
>> > degree inserts? I notice that Aloris offers holders for both, being the
>> > 16 and 16N for triangles, and 12 and 12N for the 80-degree inserts. I
>> > would guess that the 80 degree inserts are stronger.
>>
>>         I would expect so. A bit more difficulty working in deep
>> corners, but stronger for harder materials. Not likely to be something
>> which you need for hobby metalworking.
>
> OK. Much as I suspected. If triangles were too weak, they wouldn't
> dominate the catalogs.

        One reason that they dominate is that they offer three (or six
for the negative rake) possible working corners, while the others offer
two or at the most four -- so they cost less per corner.

>>         Here is an example of a shank which would accept those inserts,
>> but which is too big for our machines:
>>
>>         ebay 380015167655
>>
>> but the photos will show you what the clamp is like on those -- which
>> use the pin-head screws.
>
> Yes. I see that the pin sticks up above the top of the insert in this
> example, and would interfere if used in a holder intended for a simple
> flat triangle insert.

        Well ... as long as the hold-down has a recess to accept the
pin, you would be fine. Or -- if you use the thickest inserts.

>
>>         Beware that many have 1x1" square shanks and thus are poor
>> choices for our machines. Look for 5/8" square shanks instead for our
>> machines.
>
> Or get the BXA-1S or BXA-2S holders, which accept 3/4" shanks.

        O.K. I discovered those long after I had modified the shanks on
my 3/4" ones from eBay auctions.

        [ ... ]

>> These were found with a search for:
>>
>>         TNMG inserts carbide
>>
>> without bothering to specify the size.
>
> I just did that search. Lots of inserts for sale, too. The sad thing
> is that the insert codes are beginning to make sense to me.

        :-)

> Brothers Machinery, which is almost near me, also has boxes of inserts
> for sale. As well as holders without end.

        You may have a good source then -- especially if they will deal
with walk-in customers. :-)

        [ ... ]

        Enjoy,
                DoN.

--
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Posted by Joseph Gwinn on April 10, 2008, 11:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> >
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> >> > That raises a question: How do the triange inserts differ from the 80
> >> > degree inserts? I notice that Aloris offers holders for both, being the
> >> > 16 and 16N for triangles, and 12 and 12N for the 80-degree inserts. I
> >> > would guess that the 80 degree inserts are stronger.
> >>
> >>         I would expect so. A bit more difficulty working in deep
> >> corners, but stronger for harder materials. Not likely to be something
> >> which you need for hobby metalworking.
> >
> > OK. Much as I suspected. If triangles were too weak, they wouldn't
> > dominate the catalogs.
>
>         One reason that they dominate is that they offer three (or six
> for the negative rake) possible working corners, while the others offer
> two or at the most four -- so [triangles] cost less per corner.

Yes. Although the positive rake triangles have only three useful
corners per insert.


> >>         Here is an example of a shank which would accept those inserts,
> >> but which is too big for our machines:
> >>
> >>         ebay 380015167655
> >>
> >> but the photos will show you what the clamp is like on those -- which
> >> use the pin-head screws.
> >
> > Yes. I see that the pin sticks up above the top of the insert in this
> > example, and would interfere if used in a holder intended for a simple
> > flat triangle insert.
>
>         Well ... as long as the hold-down has a recess to accept the
> pin, you would be fine. Or -- if you use the thickest inserts.

Yes, but clearly you have not had problems with the inserts pulling out.


> >>         Beware that many have 1x1" square shanks and thus are poor
> >> choices for our machines. Look for 5/8" square shanks instead for our
> >> machines.
> >
> > Or get the BXA-1S or BXA-2S holders, which accept 3/4" shanks.
>
>         O.K. I discovered those long after I had modified the shanks on
> my 3/4" ones from eBay auctions.

MSC doesn't offer them, but Aloris will sell you some.


> > Brothers Machinery, which is almost near me, also has boxes of inserts
> > for sale. As well as holders without end.
>
>         You may have a good source then -- especially if they will deal
> with walk-in customers. :-)

Well, it's a bit too far to walk, but they haven't thrown me out just
yet. They were happy to take my money too.

Joe Gwinn

Posted by DoN. Nichols on April 11, 2008, 6:02 pm
Please log in for more thread options
>

        [ ... ]

>> > OK. Much as I suspected. If triangles were too weak, they wouldn't
>> > dominate the catalogs.
>>
>>         One reason that they dominate is that they offer three (or six
>> for the negative rake) possible working corners, while the others offer
>> two or at the most four -- so [triangles] cost less per corner.
>
> Yes. Although the positive rake triangles have only three useful
> corners per insert.

        Of course. Note that I said "three (or six for the negative
rake)". But the positive rake four-sided inserts have only two so the
triangular ones still win.

        [ ... ]

>> > Yes. I see that the pin sticks up above the top of the insert in this
>> > example, and would interfere if used in a holder intended for a simple
>> > flat triangle insert.
>>
>>         Well ... as long as the hold-down has a recess to accept the
>> pin, you would be fine. Or -- if you use the thickest inserts.
>
> Yes, but clearly you have not had problems with the inserts pulling out.

        Right -- and I've cut hard enough to slow down the 1-1/2 HP
motor through step belts (which are more efficient than the vari-speed,
so it is probably equivalent to a 2HP motor on yours).

>
>> >>         Beware that many have 1x1" square shanks and thus are poor
>> >> choices for our machines. Look for 5/8" square shanks instead for our
>> >> machines.
>> >
>> > Or get the BXA-1S or BXA-2S holders, which accept 3/4" shanks.
>>
>>         O.K. I discovered those long after I had modified the shanks on
>> my 3/4" ones from eBay auctions.
>
> MSC doesn't offer them, but Aloris will sell you some.

        That probably explains why I had not discovered them.

>> > Brothers Machinery, which is almost near me, also has boxes of inserts
>> > for sale. As well as holders without end.
>>
>>         You may have a good source then -- especially if they will deal
>> with walk-in customers. :-)
>
> Well, it's a bit too far to walk, but they haven't thrown me out just
> yet. They were happy to take my money too.

        Good.

        Enjoy,
                DoN.

--
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last April 5, 2008, 10:26 pm
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last April 6, 2008, 3:18 am
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last April 6, 2008, 3:04 pm
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last April 6, 2008, 5:48 pm
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last April 7, 2008, 12:50 am
Re: Clausing 5914 chatter -- solved at last April 7, 2008, 10:10 pm
Clausing 5914 chatter -- update April 13, 2008, 11:17 pm
Clausing 5914 chatter -- update 2 April 27, 2008, 7:34 pm
Clausing 5914 - Chatter and Self-Feeding Summary June 5, 2008, 12:56 pm
Clausing 5914 Questions December 1, 2007, 6:10 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap