|
Posted by sittingduck on May 6, 2006, 8:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Anthony wrote:
> OT bullshit not marked OT
>
wow, they say nothing about the ongoing saga of criminal republicans, but the
instant they find something on a democrat they scream for a rope....
Does anyone think Gunner isn't brain-damaged?
--
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities" -
Voltaire
|
|
Posted by Hawke on May 7, 2006, 4:20 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Anthony wrote:
>
> > OT bullshit not marked OT
> >
>
> wow, they say nothing about the ongoing saga of criminal republicans, but
the
> instant they find something on a democrat they scream for a rope....
> Does anyone think Gunner isn't brain-damaged?
We all know the sad case of Gunner's brain situation. But aside from making
a scene every time a Democrat goes off the rails, don't you wonder how many
of those criticizing Kennedy are themselves drug addicts and alcoholics? We
already have seen what a hypocrite the drug addled Rush Limbaugh is, and to
make matters worse, he's on record as being for harsh and extreme penalties
for people committing drug related crimes, with himself excepted. I expect
that the same is true for those right wingers coming down on Kennedy for his
drug problems. They probably have the same problems, but being hypocrites,
they take the opportunity to come down on someone else whenever possible.
Which only goes to show their complete lack of character.
Hawke
|
|
Posted by Cliff on May 7, 2006, 7:05 pm
Please log in for more thread options wrote:
>I doubt that he had diddle to do with your lack of being informed, or
>your constant unsported spew.
Found those "WMDs" yet?
How about those three "communists" under your bed?
--
Cliff
|
|
Posted by Jeff McCann on May 9, 2006, 9:51 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Gunner wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:29:33 -0700, Stuart Grey
> >
> >
> >>sittingduck wrote:
> >>
> >>>Anthony wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>OT bullshit not marked OT
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>wow, they say nothing about the ongoing saga of criminal republicans,
but the
> >>>instant they find something on a democrat they scream for a rope....
> >>>Does anyone think Gunner isn't brain-damaged?
> >>
> >>I doubt Gunner is serious, but rather, was doing satire that highlighted
> >>that Limbaugh and Kennedy both get special treatment.
> >
> >
> > What special treatment did Limbaugh get? Other than THE TREATMENT.?
>
> Being singled out for a law that is almost never prosecuted, having them
> go to the Florida Supreme court to violate his right to privacy, and
> then have it blasted all over the press that he copped a "plea" when
> basically the DA had to give up because he couldn't get an indictment
> for any of the trumped up charges they tried to pin on him is pretty
> special.
So what? Not many drug addicts have the cash to doctor shop and
fraudulently obtain prescriptions for controlled drugs. Either they have
health insurance, which would detect the crime, or they're broke, so they
can't do it. It's still a felony, though. He also had the money for an
interlocutory appeal to the FLSC, who's order protected Limbaugh's privacy
rights, so they were not violated. Freedom of the press is something
Limbaugh relies on, so he's in no position to complain about it now.
Lastly, you assume without any evidence whatsoever that the Prosecutor
"couldn't get and indictment," just because, as in about 90% of cases,
Limbaugh was able to negotiate a plea deal.
Limbaugh got fair, even generous, treatment in his felony case. Any claim
to the contrary is just so much partisan whining.
Jeff
|
|
Posted by Gunner on May 10, 2006, 4:47 am
Please log in for more thread options wrote:
>
>> Gunner wrote:
>> > On Sat, 06 May 2006 17:29:33 -0700, Stuart Grey
>> >
>> >
>> >>sittingduck wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Anthony wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>OT bullshit not marked OT
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>wow, they say nothing about the ongoing saga of criminal republicans,
>but the
>> >>>instant they find something on a democrat they scream for a rope....
>> >>>Does anyone think Gunner isn't brain-damaged?
>> >>
>> >>I doubt Gunner is serious, but rather, was doing satire that highlighted
>> >>that Limbaugh and Kennedy both get special treatment.
>> >
>> >
>> > What special treatment did Limbaugh get? Other than THE TREATMENT.?
>>
>> Being singled out for a law that is almost never prosecuted, having them
>> go to the Florida Supreme court to violate his right to privacy, and
>> then have it blasted all over the press that he copped a "plea" when
>> basically the DA had to give up because he couldn't get an indictment
>> for any of the trumped up charges they tried to pin on him is pretty
>> special.
>
>So what? Not many drug addicts have the cash to doctor shop and
>fraudulently obtain prescriptions for controlled drugs. Either they have
>health insurance, which would detect the crime, or they're broke, so they
>can't do it. It's still a felony, though. He also had the money for an
>interlocutory appeal to the FLSC, who's order protected Limbaugh's privacy
>rights, so they were not violated. Freedom of the press is something
>Limbaugh relies on, so he's in no position to complain about it now.
>Lastly, you assume without any evidence whatsoever that the Prosecutor
>"couldn't get and indictment," just because, as in about 90% of cases,
>Limbaugh was able to negotiate a plea deal.
>
>Limbaugh got fair, even generous, treatment in his felony case. Any claim
>to the contrary is just so much partisan whining.
>
>Jeff
>
Snicker...Jeff..claiming that it was fair, is just so much partisan
denial.
Gunner
"The importance of morality is that people behave themselves even if
nobody's watching. There are not enough cops and laws to replace
personal morality as a means to produce a civilized society. Indeed,
the police and criminal justice system are the last desperate line of
defense for a civilized society. Unfortunately, too many of us see
police, laws and the criminal justice system as society's first line
of defense." --Walter Williams
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: Execute Patrick Kennedy (Dem) Now! | May 10, 2006, 3:45 am |
| Re: Execute Patrick Kennedy (Dem) Now! | May 8, 2006, 1:40 pm |
| Re: Execute Patrick Kennedy (Dem) Now! | May 8, 2006, 1:37 pm |
| Re: Execute Patrick Kennedy (Dem) Now! | May 7, 2006, 7:03 pm |
| Re: Execute Patrick Kennedy (Dem) Now! | May 6, 2006, 6:14 pm |
| Re: Execute Patrick Kennedy (Dem) Now! | May 6, 2006, 5:26 pm |
| my hot east won't enclose before I execute it | August 13, 2007, 12:54 am |
| Working on an old Kennedy 7 drawer unit | October 30, 2006, 8:10 pm |
| I need a hand(le); for my older Kennedy Chest | November 22, 2006, 1:54 pm |
| Execute Col. Steele for letting imprisoned children call their parents | May 2, 2007, 1:48 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>