Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane.

General Metalworking - All aspects of working with metal. 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. Hawke 02-08-2010
Posted by Hawke on February 8, 2010, 12:00 am
Please log in for more thread options


RogerN wrote:
>>>
>>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
>>>> Massachusetts,
>>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
>>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
>>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
>>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
>>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
>>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if they
>>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
>>> Yep. The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
>> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having the
>> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare as a
>> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
>> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
>> insurance.
>>
>> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The Republicans
>> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Huntress
>
> Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not the
> taxpayer funding of it. People on the inside of Planned Parenthood came out
> and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's where
> the money is. Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned Parenthood
> for profit. Many Americans are against killing innocent babies and don't
> want to fund it with their tax money. Many others are for killing babies
> but don't want taxpayers to fund it. Obamacare and Planned Parenthood want
> to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama got or
> will get a portion of those dollars.
>
> RogerN
>
>


Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults mean
so little? And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
it? You just want more and more and more?

Hawke

Posted by HHnC on February 8, 2010, 9:20 am
Please log in for more thread options


> RogerN wrote:
..
>
> >>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
> >>>> Massachusetts,
> >>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
> >>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
> >>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
> >>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
> >>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
> >>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if they
> >>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
> >>> Yep. =A0The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
> >> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having th=
e
> >> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare as a
> >> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
> >> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
> >> insurance.
>
> >> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The Republic=
ans
> >> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
>
> >> --
> >> Ed Huntress
>
> > Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not th=
e
> > taxpayer funding of it. =A0People on the inside of Planned Parenthood c=
ame out
> > and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's wh=
ere
> > the money is. =A0Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned Par=
enthood
> > for profit. =A0Many Americans are against killing innocent babies and d=
on't
> > want to fund it with their tax money. =A0Many others are for killing ba=
bies
> > but don't want taxpayers to fund it. =A0Obamacare and Planned Parenthoo=
d want
> > to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama got=
or
> > will get a portion of those dollars.
>
> > RogerN
>
> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults mean
> so little?

Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
convicted murderers means so much?

> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
> it? You just want more and more and more?
>
> Hawke

Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.

Posted by Hawke on February 10, 2010, 8:32 pm
Please log in for more thread options


HHnC wrote:
>> RogerN wrote:
>>>>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
>>>>>> Massachusetts,
>>>>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
>>>>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
>>>>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
>>>>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
>>>>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
>>>>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if they
>>>>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
>>>>> Yep. The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
>>>> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having the
>>>> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare as a
>>>> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
>>>> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
>>>> insurance.
>>>> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The Republicans
>>>> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
>>>> --
>>>> Ed Huntress
>>> Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not the
>>> taxpayer funding of it. People on the inside of Planned Parenthood came out
>>> and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's where
>>> the money is. Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned Parenthood
>>> for profit. Many Americans are against killing innocent babies and don't
>>> want to fund it with their tax money. Many others are for killing babies
>>> but don't want taxpayers to fund it. Obamacare and Planned Parenthood want
>>> to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama got or
>>> will get a portion of those dollars.
>>> RogerN
>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults mean
>> so little?
>
> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
> convicted murderers means so much?
>
>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
>> it? You just want more and more and more?
>>
>> Hawke
>
> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.


No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of the
list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are against
killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost
the title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for
killing but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing
people, meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against
killing anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just
pro unborn baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people
like you around anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the
head of the line!

Hawke

Posted by RogerN on February 11, 2010, 6:59 am
Please log in for more thread options



> HHnC wrote:
>>> RogerN wrote:
>>>>>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
>>>>>>> Massachusetts,
>>>>>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
>>>>>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
>>>>>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
>>>>>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
>>>>>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
>>>>>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if they
>>>>>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
>>>>>> Yep. The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
>>>>> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having
>>>>> the
>>>>> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare as a
>>>>> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
>>>>> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
>>>>> insurance.
>>>>> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ed Huntress
>>>> Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not
>>>> the
>>>> taxpayer funding of it. People on the inside of Planned Parenthood
>>>> came out
>>>> and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's
>>>> where
>>>> the money is. Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned
>>>> Parenthood
>>>> for profit. Many Americans are against killing innocent babies and
>>>> don't
>>>> want to fund it with their tax money. Many others are for killing
>>>> babies
>>>> but don't want taxpayers to fund it. Obamacare and Planned Parenthood
>>>> want
>>>> to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama got
>>>> or
>>>> will get a portion of those dollars.
>>>> RogerN
>>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults mean
>>> so little?
>>
>> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
>> convicted murderers means so much?
>>
>>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
>>> it? You just want more and more and more?
>>>
>>> Hawke
>>
>> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
>
>
> No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of the
> list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
> hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are against
> killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
> deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost the
> title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for killing
> but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing people,
> meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against killing
> anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just pro unborn
> baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people like you around
> anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the head of the line!
>
> Hawke

Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
difference? Would you argue that if you light street lights in the night
you should also be for lighting them in the day?

RogerN



Posted by Humperdink on February 11, 2010, 8:22 am
Please log in for more thread options


>
>
>
>
>
>
> > HHnC wrote:
> >>> RogerN wrote:
om...
:
e:
> >>>>>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
> >>>>>>> Massachusetts,
> >>>>>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
> >>>>>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
> >>>>>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
> >>>>>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
> >>>>>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
> >>>>>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if the=
y
> >>>>>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
> >>>>>> Yep. =A0The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
> >>>>> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare a=
s a
> >>>>> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
> >>>>> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
> >>>>> insurance.
> >>>>> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The
> >>>>> Republicans
> >>>>> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Ed Huntress
> >>>> Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not
> >>>> the
> >>>> taxpayer funding of it. =A0People on the inside of Planned Parenthoo=
d
> >>>> came out
> >>>> and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's
> >>>> where
> >>>> the money is. =A0Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned
> >>>> Parenthood
> >>>> for profit. =A0Many Americans are against killing innocent babies an=
d
> >>>> don't
> >>>> want to fund it with their tax money. =A0Many others are for killing
> >>>> babies
> >>>> but don't want taxpayers to fund it. =A0Obamacare and Planned Parent=
hood
> >>>> want
> >>>> to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama =
got
> >>>> or
> >>>> will get a portion of those dollars.
> >>>> RogerN
> >>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults me=
an
> >>> so little?
>
> >> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
> >> convicted murderers means so much?
>
> >>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
> >>> it? You just want more and more and more?
>
> >>> Hawke
>
> >> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
>
> > No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of th=
e
> > list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
> > hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are agains=
t
> > killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
> > deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost =
the
> > title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for killin=
g
> > but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing people,
> > meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against killing
> > anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just pro unbor=
n
> > baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people like you arou=
nd
> > anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the head of the line!
>
> > Hawke
>
> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
> difference? =A0Would you argue that if you light street lights in the nig=
ht
> you should also be for lighting them in the day?
>
> RogerN

He's upset because he's inadequate.

Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. February 2, 2010, 2:52 am
Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. February 2, 2010, 2:45 pm
Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. February 6, 2010, 1:41 pm
Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. February 6, 2010, 4:43 pm
Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. February 12, 2010, 5:26 pm
Re: OT - Most states kick blue asse February 16, 2010, 12:11 am
no verbal toes are fucking and other coherent englishmans are fierce, but will Jonnie remain that August 12, 2007, 5:32 pm
OT: failing states -- Is the US moving into this catagory? May 3, 2006, 11:31 am
said's fusion states in search of our deed after we tell before it August 13, 2007, 12:30 am
Re: Who did more damage to the United States...George Bush or Osama Bin Forgotten? January 18, 2009, 3:10 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap