|
Posted by Harold Burton on February 12, 2010, 9:08 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Harold Burton wrote:
> >
> >>>>>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults
> >>>>>> mean
> >>>>>> so little?
> >>>>> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
> >>>>> convicted murderers means so much?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
> >>>>>> it? You just want more and more and more?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hawke
> >>>>> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
> >>>> No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of the
> >>>> list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
> >>>> hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are against
> >>>> killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
> >>>> deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost
> >>>> the
> >>>> title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for killing
> >>>> but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing people,
> >>>> meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against killing
> >>>> anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just pro unborn
> >>>> baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people like you
> >>>> around
> >>>> anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the head of the line!
> >>>>
> >>>> Hawke
> >>> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
> >>> difference? Would you argue that if you light street lights in the night
> >>> you should also be for lighting them in the day?
> >>>
> >>> RogerN
> >>
> >> Hey, what do you think Jesus would say? You think he would be advocating
> >> killing anybody?
> >
> >
> >
> > Why not . . . cite chapter and verse.
> >
> >
> > Snicker.
>
>
> Ha, Ha, Ha, hey stupid, those were questions.
rhetorical questions.
Try again.
Snicker.
|
|
Posted by Hawke on February 14, 2010, 5:44 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Harold Burton wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults
>>>>>>>> mean
>>>>>>>> so little?
>>>>>>> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
>>>>>>> convicted murderers means so much?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
>>>>>>>> it? You just want more and more and more?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hawke
>>>>>>> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
>>>>>> No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of the
>>>>>> list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
>>>>>> hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are against
>>>>>> killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
>>>>>> deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for killing
>>>>>> but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing people,
>>>>>> meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against killing
>>>>>> anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just pro unborn
>>>>>> baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people like you
>>>>>> around
>>>>>> anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the head of the line!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hawke
>>>>> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
>>>>> difference? Would you argue that if you light street lights in the night
>>>>> you should also be for lighting them in the day?
>>>>>
>>>>> RogerN
>>>> Hey, what do you think Jesus would say? You think he would be advocating
>>>> killing anybody?
>>>
>>>
>>> Why not . . . cite chapter and verse.
>>>
>>>
>>> Snicker.
>>
>> Ha, Ha, Ha, hey stupid, those were questions.
>
>
>
> rhetorical questions.
>
>
> Try again.
>
>
> Snicker.
You still want the citations?
Snicker.
Hawke
|
|
Posted by Harold Burton on February 15, 2010, 10:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Harold Burton wrote:
> >
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults
> >>>>>>>> mean
> >>>>>>>> so little?
> >>>>>>> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
> >>>>>>> convicted murderers means so much?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
> >>>>>>>> it? You just want more and more and more?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hawke
> >>>>>>> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
> >>>>>> No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
> >>>>>> hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are
> >>>>>> against
> >>>>>> killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
> >>>>>> deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for
> >>>>>> killing
> >>>>>> but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing people,
> >>>>>> meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against killing
> >>>>>> anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just pro
> >>>>>> unborn
> >>>>>> baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people like you
> >>>>>> around
> >>>>>> anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the head of the line!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hawke
> >>>>> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
> >>>>> difference? Would you argue that if you light street lights in the
> >>>>> night
> >>>>> you should also be for lighting them in the day?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> RogerN
> >>>> Hey, what do you think Jesus would say? You think he would be advocating
> >>>> killing anybody?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Why not . . . cite chapter and verse.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Snicker.
> >>
> >> Ha, Ha, Ha, hey stupid, those were questions.
> >
> >
> >
> > rhetorical questions.
> >
> >
> > Try again.
> >
> >
> > Snicker.
>
>
> You still want the citations?
Still waiting.
|
|
Posted by Hawke on February 15, 2010, 11:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
>>>>>>> difference? Would you argue that if you light street lights in the
>>>>>>> night
>>>>>>> you should also be for lighting them in the day?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RogerN
>>>>>> Hey, what do you think Jesus would say? You think he would be advocating
>>>>>> killing anybody?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why not . . . cite chapter and verse.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Snicker.
>>>> Ha, Ha, Ha, hey stupid, those were questions.
>>>
>>>
>>> rhetorical questions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Try again.
>>>
>>>
>>> Snicker.
>>
>> You still want the citations?
>
>
> Still waiting.
I don't know why. You already have the cite. The questions came from me.
What more do you want?
Hawke
|
|
Posted by Harold Burton on February 17, 2010, 8:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Harold Burton wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> difference? Would you argue that if you light street lights in the
> >>>>>>> night
> >>>>>>> you should also be for lighting them in the day?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> RogerN
> >>>>>> Hey, what do you think Jesus would say? You think he would be
> >>>>>> advocating
> >>>>>> killing anybody?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why not . . . cite chapter and verse.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Snicker.
> >>>> Ha, Ha, Ha, hey stupid, those were questions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> rhetorical questions.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Try again.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Snicker.
> >>
> >> You still want the citations?
> >
> >
> > Still waiting.
> I don't know why.
You asked a rhetorical question, why are you so afraid of telling us
what the answer you expected was? Rhetorical questions DO have expected
answers
snicker.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 2, 2010, 2:52 am |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 2, 2010, 2:45 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 6, 2010, 1:41 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 6, 2010, 4:43 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 12, 2010, 5:26 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states kick blue asse | February 16, 2010, 12:11 am |
| no verbal toes are fucking and other coherent englishmans are fierce, but will Jonnie remain that | August 12, 2007, 5:32 pm |
| OT: failing states -- Is the US moving into this catagory? | May 3, 2006, 11:31 am |
| said's fusion states in search of our deed after we tell before it | August 13, 2007, 12:30 am |
| Re: Who did more damage to the United States...George Bush or Osama Bin Forgotten? | January 18, 2009, 3:10 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap