|
Posted by Burled Frau on February 14, 2010, 8:09 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Burled Frau wrote:
>
>>> Whew! I'm glad to hear you think that. Because the rule of thumb is that
>>> when a right wing kook like you thinks someone is a moron that means
>>> whatever he is saying is correct. I'm sure glad to hear your opinion
>>> because if you thought what I said is right then I would surely be
>>> mistaken. Guys like you would have said it was a good idea for George
>>> Bush to be president and that starting a war in Iraq was the right thing
>>> to do. So when you say go left then I know I should go right. For a
>>> minute there I thought you would say I was right on and that would mean
>>> I agreed with a slope head. That was a close one.
>>>
>>> Hawke
>>
>> Glad to hear you say that because the rule of them is that you libtards
>> stick your thumbs in your ass and then after licking them clean, you
>> stick them in your ears and chant "0bama". "0bama the big loser, help
>> us", "0bama the big loser, give us hope"
>
> Okay, you got your little kid playground baloney in. Too bad it means
> nothing except you can't think of anything to counter the facts. So go
> ahead rely on the childish stuff. It's your strong suit.
>
>
>> Bwahaha, how's that hope doing loser? Bush may not have been perfect, but
>> he was elected twice and is so popular, that he almost got elected a
>> third time by you libtards even though he wasn't even running. We know
>> you miss him and wish he was in charge again. That's why whenever you are
>> asked to list Presidential accomplishments, you go silent on 0bama and
>> bring up Bush instead.
>
> That's right, go ahead and accuse me of what it is you really want. I
> never wanted Bush from day one. You can't say that. You voted for him,
> twice I bet. Tell everyone you didn't help put that moron in office. I
> haven't heard you mention any of Bush's accomplishments either. So you
> tell me Bush's to get things going.
>
>>
>> Still waiting for your list of accomplishments by Obama as President.
>> Don't list them all, it would take too long. Just list about 6 or 7
>> instead. List them right here below, you loser. Start with one, and maybe
>> the rest will come easier. List them right here ->
>
> First off I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of making a list for you to
> criticize. Why do I owe you a list or anything else? No reason I can think
> of. Besides, everyone knows that you would deny anything anyone said was
> an accomplishment by Obama. Here's one for you to reject. Obama was the
> first African-American to win election to the presidency. You can't even
> acknowledge that as an accomplishment. So you see, it's you that has a
> problem. You hate Obama so much that you can't accept anything he does as
> being any good. You have a psychological problem. We call it Obama
> Derangement Syndrome or ODS. You might have heard of something similar a
> year or two ago. It means you hate someone so much you lose mental
> function. Sorry to hear about your affliction. There is no cure for it.
>
You are so wrong, you don't know how wrong you are. I did help a moron get
elected President, I voted for that chimp loser zero 0bama. Admittedly, I'm
not proud of it. It was a big mistake, he won't be getting any of my votes
this next time. He hasn't even had any accomplishments as President, and
nobody else can either. They here the word accomplishment and right away
they think of Bush.
|
|
Posted by Hawke on February 14, 2010, 8:58 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Burled Frau wrote:
> You are so wrong, you don't know how wrong you are. I did help a moron
> get elected President, I voted for that chimp loser zero 0bama.
> Admittedly, I'm not proud of it. It was a big mistake, he won't be
> getting any of my votes this next time. He hasn't even had any
> accomplishments as President, and nobody else can either. They here the
> word accomplishment and right away they think of Bush.
One simple question. Do you consider Obama getting himself elected
president of the United States to be an accomplishment? Second question;
what exactly would Obama have to to before it would meet your standards
as being an accomplishment?
Personally, if Obama gets anything passed at all, considering that the
republicans have made it their goal to stop everything Obama tries, it
would be a huge accomplishment. But for George Bush getting tax cuts
passed with a compliant republican congress is no feat at all. I think
your idea of what constitutes and accomplishment and what everybody else
thinks are completely different.
And you still have shown you haven't the guts to admit you helped put
George Bush in office. Why, too embarrassed?
Hawke
|
|
Posted by Burled Frau on February 14, 2010, 11:03 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Burled Frau wrote:
>
>> You are so wrong, you don't know how wrong you are. I did help a moron
>> get elected President, I voted for that chimp loser zero 0bama.
>> Admittedly, I'm not proud of it. It was a big mistake, he won't be
>> getting any of my votes this next time. He hasn't even had any
>> accomplishments as President, and nobody else can either. They here the
>> word accomplishment and right away they think of Bush.
>
>
>
> One simple question. Do you consider Obama getting himself elected
> president of the United States to be an accomplishment? Second question;
> what exactly would Obama have to to before it would meet your standards as
> being an accomplishment?
The question was has 0bama accomplished as President? You said you watched
him on TV listing off lots and lots of accomplishments as President. Are you
trying to tell me that 0bama claims getting elected before taking office was
an accomplishment after he took office? He's a big loser zero. As for your
second question, are you admitting then that he accomplished nothing, zero,
and that is why you are struggling with how to define an accomplishment?
It's much easier to come up with a list of failures, isn't it? Let's see,
some simple things he set out to accomplish...
Slash earmarks...Fail
Close Gitmo...Fail
State of world address on national security...Fail
End no bid contracts...fail
Affordable health care...Fail
Tax cuts for 95% of Americans...Fail
Rid the world of nuclear weapons...Fail
Catch Osama bin Laden...Fail
Shrink the military...Fail
Flying cars...Fail
You see, 0bama is a big zero failure. He's failed at the things that are
important to Americans. The fact that he is able to pick a booger out of his
nose and flick it clean across the Oval Office is hardly an accomplishment
to be proud of.
>
> Personally, if Obama gets anything passed at all, considering that the
> republicans have made it their goal to stop everything Obama tries, it
> would be a huge accomplishment. But for George Bush getting tax cuts
> passed with a compliant republican congress is no feat at all. I think
> your idea of what constitutes and accomplishment and what everybody else
> thinks are completely different.
>
>
> And you still have shown you haven't the guts to admit you helped put
> George Bush in office. Why, too embarrassed?
Sigh, let me explain it to you again, in case you didn't understand the
first time. Obama won the election by beating out everyone who ran against
him, including other democrats as well as Republicans. Even if I would have
liked to help Bush get into office, there's nothing I could do. He's not
allowed a third term. So even if 0bama did win, and you think he finally
beat Bush, you'll have to learn to deal with reality instead of some fantasy
of 0bama the superhero defeating Bush. Bush was undefeatable when he ran, he
can't run any more. Deal with your BDS.
|
|
Posted by Harold Burton on February 11, 2010, 11:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> > HHnC wrote:
> >>> RogerN wrote:
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
> >>>>>>> Massachusetts,
> >>>>>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
> >>>>>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
> >>>>>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
> >>>>>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
> >>>>>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
> >>>>>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if they
> >>>>>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
> >>>>>> Yep. The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
> >>>>> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare as a
> >>>>> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
> >>>>> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
> >>>>> insurance.
> >>>>> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The
> >>>>> Republicans
> >>>>> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Ed Huntress
> >>>> Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not
> >>>> the
> >>>> taxpayer funding of it. People on the inside of Planned Parenthood
> >>>> came out
> >>>> and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's
> >>>> where
> >>>> the money is. Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned
> >>>> Parenthood
> >>>> for profit. Many Americans are against killing innocent babies and
> >>>> don't
> >>>> want to fund it with their tax money. Many others are for killing
> >>>> babies
> >>>> but don't want taxpayers to fund it. Obamacare and Planned Parenthood
> >>>> want
> >>>> to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama got
> >>>> or
> >>>> will get a portion of those dollars.
> >>>> RogerN
> >>> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults mean
> >>> so little?
> >>
> >> Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
> >> convicted murderers means so much?
> >>
> >>> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
> >>> it? You just want more and more and more?
> >>>
> >>> Hawke
> >>
> >> Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
> >
> >
> > No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of the
> > list of undesirables to be done away with. When someone is so dumb or
> > hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are against
> > killing people, any people, then you deserve culling. Once you start
> > deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost the
> > title of pro life. Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for killing
> > but you have some arbitrary rules. If you are against killing people,
> > meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against killing
> > anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just pro unborn
> > baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people like you around
> > anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the head of the line!
> >
> > Hawke
>
> Against killing innocent people versus murderers and you can't tell the
> difference?
Clearly not, but he's a leftard so we don't expect to much sense out of
him.
Snicker.
|
|
Posted by Humperdink on February 11, 2010, 8:21 am
Please log in for more thread options
> HHnC wrote:
> >> RogerN wrote:
m...
:
> >>>>>> The other nine most Democratic states are Rhode Island,
> >>>>>> Massachusetts,
> >>>>>> Maryland, Vermont, Hawaii, New York, Illinois, Connecticut and
> >>>>>> Delaware. Each of the top 10 Democratic states had more than a 22
> >>>>>> percentage point party affiliation advantage for the Democrats.
> >>>>> Massachusetts? Sure didn't get Martha Coakley elected there in a
> >>>>> recent statewide election against Scott Brown, did it?
> >>>>> Wake up. The masses are rejecting liberalism and liberals - if they
> >>>>> haven't already. Even in Massachusetts.
> >>>>> Yep. =A0The masses are rejecting liberal Republicans, too.
> >>>> Scott Brown supports a woman's right to abortion; he opposes having =
the
> >>>> federal government ban gay marriage; and, having lived on welfare as=
a
> >>>> child, he's "moderate" on that issue. He supports the Massachusetts
> >>>> universal health care insurance plan that forces residents to buy
> >>>> insurance.
> >>>> Sure, Massachusetts rejected a liberal Republican. Right. The Republ=
icans
> >>>> might find they should have supported Coakley. <g>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Ed Huntress
> >>> Brown supports the woman's right to kill the baby inside her but not =
the
> >>> taxpayer funding of it. =A0People on the inside of Planned Parenthood=
came out
> >>> and told that they said they wanted to push abortions because that's =
where
> >>> the money is. =A0Obama wants to give taxpayer money to fund Planned P=
arenthood
> >>> for profit. =A0Many Americans are against killing innocent babies and=
don't
> >>> want to fund it with their tax money. =A0Many others are for killing =
babies
> >>> but don't want taxpayers to fund it. =A0Obamacare and Planned Parenth=
ood want
> >>> to kill babies because that's where the money is and I'll bet Obama g=
ot or
> >>> will get a portion of those dollars.
> >>> RogerN
> >> Why is it that unborn babies mean so much to you but living adults mea=
n
> >> so little?
>
> > Why is it that innocent life means so little to you and the lives of
> > convicted murderers means so much?
>
> >> And didn't you know the earth has too many people living on
> >> it? You just want more and more and more?
>
> >> Hawke
>
> > Offing yourself will help you achieve your goals.
>
> No, we start with the useless garbage, which puts you at the head of the
> list of undesirables to be done away with.
Why do you hate veterans so much?
> When someone is so dumb or
> hypocritical as to not see that if you are pro life then you are against
> killing people, any people, then you deserve culling.
I'm good with life in prison w/o parole.
Are you good with no abortions?
Tell me which you are; dumb or hypocritical?
> Once you start
> deciding which people can be killed and which can't then you have lost
> the title of pro life.
What crime has a baby committed? Will you stop killing them and just
sentence them to life w/o parole?
> Babys no, bad people, yes, that makes you for
> killing but you have some arbitrary rules.
I said I was good with life w/o parole. I've always said that.
> If you are against killing
> people, meaning really pro life you are like a Quaker. You are against
> killing anyone. But you fake pro lifers are not really pro life, just
> pro unborn baby life. So you're just hypocrites and who needs people
> like you around anyway? Not me. Let the culling begin. You go to the
> head of the line!
Why do you hate veterans so much?
> Hawke
Hawke, did you ever figure out how many gallons are in a 5 gallon
carboy?
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 2, 2010, 2:52 am |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 2, 2010, 2:45 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 6, 2010, 1:41 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 6, 2010, 4:43 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states remain blue ...and sane. | February 12, 2010, 5:26 pm |
| Re: OT - Most states kick blue asse | February 16, 2010, 12:11 am |
| no verbal toes are fucking and other coherent englishmans are fierce, but will Jonnie remain that | August 12, 2007, 5:32 pm |
| OT: failing states -- Is the US moving into this catagory? | May 3, 2006, 11:31 am |
| said's fusion states in search of our deed after we tell before it | August 13, 2007, 12:30 am |
| Re: Who did more damage to the United States...George Bush or Osama Bin Forgotten? | January 18, 2009, 3:10 pm |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>