|
Posted by Tom Gardner on March 30, 2008, 11:47 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:44:40 -0600, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
>
>>DanG wrote:
>>
>>> It always amazes me, the sheer number of people who don't read the
>>> original message.
>>
>>Aint that the truth. :-)
>
> Was that a question, Lew?
>
I didn't read it that way...it's something about something else.
|
|
Posted by Larry Jaques on March 31, 2008, 8:55 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:47:44 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
>
>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:44:40 -0600, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
>>
>>>DanG wrote:
>>>
>>>> It always amazes me, the sheer number of people who don't read the
>>>> original message.
>>>
>>>Aint that the truth. :-)
>>
>> Was that a question, Lew?
>>
>
>I didn't read it that way...it's something about something else.
Hayseuss Crisco! It went over your head, too? Actually, it was a
double entendre. First, he asked a question and ended it with a
period, not a question mark. Second, it pointed out the irony of the
masses. Too many people hear what they want to hear respond to the
questions in themselves rather than reading the question and answering
it for the OP.
You've got to get out more, Tawm. ;)
--
Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.
|
|
Posted by Tom Gardner on March 31, 2008, 12:30 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:47:44 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
>
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:44:40 -0600, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
>>>
>>>>DanG wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It always amazes me, the sheer number of people who don't read the
>>>>> original message.
>>>>
>>>>Aint that the truth. :-)
>>>
>>> Was that a question, Lew?
>>>
>>
>>I didn't read it that way...it's something about something else.
>
> Hayseuss Crisco! It went over your head, too? Actually, it was a
> double entendre. First, he asked a question and ended it with a
> period, not a question mark. Second, it pointed out the irony of the
> masses. Too many people hear what they want to hear respond to the
> questions in themselves rather than reading the question and answering
> it for the OP.
>
> You've got to get out more, Tawm. ;)
>
> --
> Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.
I see my attempt at jocularity fell short, I was being vague in the mater of
perception of the obvious.
|
|
Posted by Larry Jaques on March 31, 2008, 7:41 pm
Please log in for more thread options On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:30:40 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
>
>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:47:44 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
>>
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:44:40 -0600, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
>>>>
>>>>>DanG wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It always amazes me, the sheer number of people who don't read the
>>>>>> original message.
>>>>>
>>>>>Aint that the truth. :-)
>>>>
>>>> Was that a question, Lew?
>>>>
>>>
>>>I didn't read it that way...it's something about something else.
>>
>> Hayseuss Crisco! It went over your head, too? Actually, it was a
>> double entendre. First, he asked a question and ended it with a
>> period, not a question mark. Second, it pointed out the irony of the
>> masses. Too many people hear what they want to hear respond to the
>> questions in themselves rather than reading the question and answering
>> it for the OP.
>>
>> You've got to get out more, Tawm. ;)
>>
>> --
>> Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.
>
>I see my attempt at jocularity fell short,
See? You shouldn't have bought it at Wally World.
>I was being vague in the mater of perception of the obvious.
Bbbut, isn't that what you always do, Tawm?
--
Books are the compasses and telescopes and sextants and charts which other
men have prepared to help us navigate the dangerous seas of human life.
--Jesse Lee Bennett
|
|
Posted by Robert Swinney on April 1, 2008, 11:10 am
Please log in for more thread options Careful Tom. 'Obvious' to these clowns is kin to a "2 x 4 up agin the side o'
their heads.
Bob Swinney
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:47:44 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, "Tom
>
>>
>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:44:40 -0600, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
>>>
>>>>DanG wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It always amazes me, the sheer number of people who don't read the
>>>>> original message.
>>>>
>>>>Aint that the truth. :-)
>>>
>>> Was that a question, Lew?
>>>
>>
>>I didn't read it that way...it's something about something else.
>
> Hayseuss Crisco! It went over your head, too? Actually, it was a
> double entendre. First, he asked a question and ended it with a
> period, not a question mark. Second, it pointed out the irony of the
> masses. Too many people hear what they want to hear respond to the
> questions in themselves rather than reading the question and answering
> it for the OP.
>
> You've got to get out more, Tawm. ;)
>
> --
> Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.
I see my attempt at jocularity fell short, I was being vague in the mater of
perception of the obvious.
|
| Similar Threads | Posted | | The 4th China International Wood and Wood Products Trade Conference | January 23, 2008, 10:28 pm |
| Should I heat treat ? | August 27, 2007, 10:05 pm |
| TI- Heat treat? | April 8, 2008, 11:47 am |
| W-1 heat treat problem? | November 5, 2006, 2:36 am |
| he will treat the noisy mud and house it during its counter | August 13, 2007, 12:36 am |
| my sharp justification won't treat before I contact it | August 13, 2007, 12:58 am |
| Cheap heat-treat oven | March 22, 2006, 6:26 pm |
| Wood Preservatives | July 25, 2007, 1:52 pm |
| Cedar Wood | April 3, 2008, 1:05 pm |
| Cedar Wood | April 5, 2008, 9:47 am |
|
|
Yahoo! 
Google 
Windows Live 
del.icio.us 
digg 
Netscape 
XML Sitemap
>