Pneumatic Control

Model Engineering in UK - Model engineering, metal crafts in UK 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Pneumatic Control Andrew Mawson 10-12-2006
Posted by Tom on October 12, 2006, 3:40 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Andrew Mawson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:30:16 GMT, John Stevenson
> >
> >
> > >
> > >Sorry Peter but these don't work as they should because air is
> > >compressible.
> > >In Andrews case as the furnace tilts it's weight alters and
> generally
> > >stuffs any load calculations.
> > >
> > >What you have is an air / hydraulic damper in effect.
> >
> > John, point taken that the load is fairly large on Andrews furnace,
> > but I've been fitting these flow controllers on pneumatic systems
> for
> > 20 years and they are very effective.
> > If we had a particularly large download with possible shock impact
> at
> > the end I would either use a cylinder with cushioned end travel or
> fit
> > an Ace Linear Decelerator.
> >
> > I completely agree that air over hydraulic gives a far smoother and
> > much more linear control, but my thoughts were that this is a
> > relatively cheap way to get control where none exists at the moment.
> >
> > Peter
>
> Now this is VERY interesting ! The two cylinders and valve say that
> they are pneumatic fittings, but the scrap furnace man that I got it
> from reckoned that the foundry had been using the cooling water for
> the coil (pumped round at about 45 psi). Now that gives me two
> problems. Firstly it leaks like a sieve - the cylinder end seals are
> hissing. Secondly, my furnace coolant water is a sealed system to keep
> air bubbles out - takes AGES to de-air it and is filled with expensive
> special antifreeze. This furnace body plumbing is done in 15mm
> stainless steel pipe and standard compression fittings between the
> cylinders and spool valve which I had assumed was to be proof against
> the odd splash of molten metal. I can see I'm going to have to strip
> the cylinders and see if they are repairable, I don't fancy oil (as
> per Johns cunning suggestion) or coolant spraying out at the wrong
> time. ( a few weeks ago I was doing a melt when it was pouring down
> outside, and a single rain drop dripped into the crucible of molten
> iron - made a very impressive BANG ! )
>
> AWEM

You could, of course, hook it up to your garden hose, after
you're fixed the leaks, of course.:-)

Tom

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Posted by Andrew Mawson on October 12, 2006, 3:59 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Andrew Mawson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:30:16 GMT, John Stevenson
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Sorry Peter but these don't work as they should because air is
> > > >compressible.
> > > >In Andrews case as the furnace tilts it's weight alters and
> > generally
> > > >stuffs any load calculations.
> > > >
> > > >What you have is an air / hydraulic damper in effect.
> > >
> > > John, point taken that the load is fairly large on Andrews
furnace,
> > > but I've been fitting these flow controllers on pneumatic
systems
> > for
> > > 20 years and they are very effective.
> > > If we had a particularly large download with possible shock
impact
> > at
> > > the end I would either use a cylinder with cushioned end travel
or
> > fit
> > > an Ace Linear Decelerator.
> > >
> > > I completely agree that air over hydraulic gives a far smoother
and
> > > much more linear control, but my thoughts were that this is a
> > > relatively cheap way to get control where none exists at the
moment.
> > >
> > > Peter
> >
> > Now this is VERY interesting ! The two cylinders and valve say
that
> > they are pneumatic fittings, but the scrap furnace man that I got
it
> > from reckoned that the foundry had been using the cooling water
for
> > the coil (pumped round at about 45 psi). Now that gives me two
> > problems. Firstly it leaks like a sieve - the cylinder end seals
are
> > hissing. Secondly, my furnace coolant water is a sealed system to
keep
> > air bubbles out - takes AGES to de-air it and is filled with
expensive
> > special antifreeze. This furnace body plumbing is done in 15mm
> > stainless steel pipe and standard compression fittings between the
> > cylinders and spool valve which I had assumed was to be proof
against
> > the odd splash of molten metal. I can see I'm going to have to
strip
> > the cylinders and see if they are repairable, I don't fancy oil
(as
> > per Johns cunning suggestion) or coolant spraying out at the wrong
> > time. ( a few weeks ago I was doing a melt when it was pouring
down
> > outside, and a single rain drop dripped into the crucible of
molten
> > iron - made a very impressive BANG ! )
> >
> > AWEM
>
> You could, of course, hook it up to your garden hose, after
> you're fixed the leaks, of course.:-)
>
> Tom

Yes tempting isn't it !

I stripped the spool valve to see if I could change any seals, and was
expecting to find a cylindrical spool with 'o' rings. Instead it was a
flat surface with ports cut into it, with a plastic shoe sliding over
them rather in the fashon of a steam engine valve chest, with pressure
of the air / water / oil etc pressing the shoe in tight contact with
the face. This explains why it leaks like a sieve at lowish pressures
and improves at the pressure increases.

AWEM



Posted by Tom on October 12, 2006, 4:21 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Andrew Mawson wrote:
>
> > Andrew Mawson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:30:16 GMT, John Stevenson
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Sorry Peter but these don't work as they should because air is
> > > > >compressible.
> > > > >In Andrews case as the furnace tilts it's weight alters and
> > > generally
> > > > >stuffs any load calculations.
> > > > >
> > > > >What you have is an air / hydraulic damper in effect.
> > > >
> > > > John, point taken that the load is fairly large on Andrews
> furnace,
> > > > but I've been fitting these flow controllers on pneumatic
> systems
> > > for
> > > > 20 years and they are very effective.
> > > > If we had a particularly large download with possible shock
> impact
> > > at
> > > > the end I would either use a cylinder with cushioned end travel
> or
> > > fit
> > > > an Ace Linear Decelerator.
> > > >
> > > > I completely agree that air over hydraulic gives a far smoother
> and
> > > > much more linear control, but my thoughts were that this is a
> > > > relatively cheap way to get control where none exists at the
> moment.
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > >
> > > Now this is VERY interesting ! The two cylinders and valve say
> that
> > > they are pneumatic fittings, but the scrap furnace man that I got
> it
> > > from reckoned that the foundry had been using the cooling water
> for
> > > the coil (pumped round at about 45 psi). Now that gives me two
> > > problems. Firstly it leaks like a sieve - the cylinder end seals
> are
> > > hissing. Secondly, my furnace coolant water is a sealed system to
> keep
> > > air bubbles out - takes AGES to de-air it and is filled with
> expensive
> > > special antifreeze. This furnace body plumbing is done in 15mm
> > > stainless steel pipe and standard compression fittings between the
> > > cylinders and spool valve which I had assumed was to be proof
> against
> > > the odd splash of molten metal. I can see I'm going to have to
> strip
> > > the cylinders and see if they are repairable, I don't fancy oil
> (as
> > > per Johns cunning suggestion) or coolant spraying out at the wrong
> > > time. ( a few weeks ago I was doing a melt when it was pouring
> down
> > > outside, and a single rain drop dripped into the crucible of
> molten
> > > iron - made a very impressive BANG ! )
> > >
> > > AWEM
> >
> > You could, of course, hook it up to your garden hose, after
> > you're fixed the leaks, of course.:-)
> >
> > Tom
>
> Yes tempting isn't it !
>
> I stripped the spool valve to see if I could change any seals, and was
> expecting to find a cylindrical spool with 'o' rings. Instead it was a
> flat surface with ports cut into it, with a plastic shoe sliding over
> them rather in the fashon of a steam engine valve chest, with pressure
> of the air / water / oil etc pressing the shoe in tight contact with
> the face. This explains why it leaks like a sieve at lowish pressures
> and improves at the pressure increases.
>
> AWEM

Cheap power source, over the years I must have built 5 or 6
lifts for friends, powered by mains water supply. First is
still going after more than 20 years.
Since I convinced a friend to automate his glasshouse ventilation
system utilizing water pressure, we have not had to buy tomatoes. :-)

Tom

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


Posted by Mark Rand on October 12, 2006, 6:11 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:59:35 +0100, "Andrew Mawson"


>>
>> You could, of course, hook it up to your garden hose, after
>> you're fixed the leaks, of course.:-)
>>
>> Tom
>
>Yes tempting isn't it !
>
>I stripped the spool valve to see if I could change any seals, and was
>expecting to find a cylindrical spool with 'o' rings. Instead it was a
>flat surface with ports cut into it, with a plastic shoe sliding over
>them rather in the fashon of a steam engine valve chest, with pressure
>of the air / water / oil etc pressing the shoe in tight contact with
>the face. This explains why it leaks like a sieve at lowish pressures
>and improves at the pressure increases.
>
>AWEM
>


So tell us. What are you casting in this marvelous facility and what are your
rates per pound for additional projects?


Might have a Norton gearbox project in the forseable future and I'd be stuck
between fabricated steel, aluminium or building a cupola and having the
neighbours call the police :-)


Mark Rand
RTFM

Posted by Greg on October 12, 2006, 5:42 pm
Please log in for more thread options
My apologies for the language, and I'm not having a go at you Andrew, but
you brought back some very unpleasant memories and I wouldn't want anyone to
suffer like that, or worse.

Getting back on topic, pneumatics are a very poor form of motion control if
you want to do anything more than slam something from one stop to another,
in effect you're trying to move something by pulling on it with bits of
elastic. Our production machines make extensive use of pneumatics but not
for precise control, just moving from stop to stop. Yes you can restrict the
flow or even get proportional valves, at a price, but at the end of the day
air is springy. If you want control you need either hydraulics or motors and
gearboxes/leadscrews.

Greg



Similar ThreadsPosted
hydraulic /pneumatic cylinders May 30, 2008, 3:10 pm
Jaguar Cub Remote Control Box August 3, 2008, 10:53 am
Turnbuckle style control rods October 4, 2006, 8:06 pm
OT: Lawnmower operator presence control August 1, 2008, 11:34 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap