Quiet

Model Engineering in UK - Model engineering, metal crafts in UK 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Quiet Peter Neill 03-13-2008
Posted by mark on March 14, 2008, 7:17 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> Tim Leech wrote:
> > The clerestory section of the boat roof contains the water tanks, the
> > old loose-fitting timber top had rotted away and the leakage was
> > causing the steel below to rot. The new top, 24' long, is rolled and
> > folded 2.5mm steel, with the seams between plates =A0welded, and the
> > flanged edges secured with about 150 M6 stainless machine screws
> > tapped into the existing 5mm upstand. I only broke one tap doing the
> > 150 holes freehand, not sure whether to be proud or embarassed ;-)
>
> Be very proud ;-) BTW, if the water tanks are contained in the roof
> section than I hate to think what that does to the stability of the
> narrowboat!!!
>
> --
> Michael Clarke

narrow boats cant be that bad ...
one sales from glasson dock lancashire to conwy habour north wales
every year.

all the best.mark

Posted by Tim Leech on March 15, 2008, 4:07 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:30:42 +0100, Michael Clarke

> BTW, if the water tanks are contained in the roof
>section than I hate to think what that does to the stability of the
>narrowboat!!!

Not an issue in this particular case, and the same system has been
used occasionally, and successfully, on narrow boats for at least 50
years. Its great advantage is that it provides gravity feed.
I can see stability might become an issue if it was used on a boat
with a very heavy steel cabin, 5mm or even 6mm as is sometimes used.

Tim

Posted by mark on March 16, 2008, 7:13 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:30:42 +0100, Michael Clarke
>
> > BTW, if the water tanks are contained in the roof
> >section than I hate to think what that does to the stability of the
> >narrowboat!!!
>
> Not an issue in this particular case, and the same system has been
> used occasionally, and successfully, on narrow boats for at least 50
> years. Its great advantage is that it provides gravity feed.
> I can see stability might become an issue if it was used on a boat
> with a very heavy steel cabin, 5mm or even 6mm as is sometimes used.
>
> Tim

Tim instructed

Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 4 days (21 Mar, 19:19).

how are all these messages going to make sence...in the years to
come.......... if you have your replies removed Tim

and why?

all the best.mark

Posted by John Stevenson on March 16, 2008, 7:31 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:13:59 -0700 (PDT), mark

>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:30:42 +0100, Michael Clarke
>>
>> > BTW, if the water tanks are contained in the roof
>> >section than I hate to think what that does to the stability of the
>> >narrowboat!!!
>>
>> Not an issue in this particular case, and the same system has been
>> used occasionally, and successfully, on narrow boats for at least 50
>> years. Its great advantage is that it provides gravity feed.
>> I can see stability might become an issue if it was used on a boat
>> with a very heavy steel cabin, 5mm or even 6mm as is sometimes used.
>>
>> Tim
>
>Tim instructed
>
>Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
>This message will be removed from Groups in 4 days (21 Mar, 19:19).
>
>how are all these messages going to make sence...in the years to
>come.......... if you have your replies removed Tim
>
>and why?
>
>all the best.mark

What ??
Where did this come from ? never saw this on my copy and anyway no one
has any control over Usenet.
Me things someone is giving you a wind Mark.

.

Posted by Peter A Forbes on March 17, 2008, 2:53 am
Please log in for more thread options
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 23:31:15 GMT, John Stevenson

>What ??
>Where did this come from ? never saw this on my copy and anyway no one
>has any control over Usenet.
>Me things someone is giving you a wind Mark.
>

You can set your message to self-destruct, look at the headers.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: uk.rec.models.engineering
Subject: Re: Quiet
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:07:23 +0000
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
X-No-Archive: yes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.78.28.45
X-Trace: 15 Mar 2008 08:07:23 GMT, 213.78.28.45
Lines: 14
Path:
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.gamma.ru!Gamma.RU!nntp1.phx1.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!nntp.gblx.net!212.67.96.135!213.78.28.45
Bytes: 1387
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.rec.models.engineering:52069
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Peter
--
Peter & Rita Forbes
Email: diesel@easynet.co.uk
http://www.oldengine.org/members/diesel
http://www.stationary-engine.co.uk
http://www.oldengine.co.uk


Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap