Re: Computer power usage

Model Engineering in UK - Model engineering, metal crafts in UK 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Re: Computer power usage max 01-07-2008
Posted by Andrew Mawson on January 8, 2008, 12:49 pm
Please log in for more thread options


> Guildford had an ICL1900 with 16kb words of core store - 16bit I
think so
> switching back to 8 bit processors was another backwards step.
>
> ( So we are nearly back to stone tables Peter :) )
>
> --
> Lester Caine - G8HFL

Now you have done it Lester; I remember well the meetings we had to
tell us that the ICL1900 we were installing was "state of the art" and
would make life so much simpler. Then the difficult meetings to tell
the SIX girls who worked out the wages and bonus that four of them
would need to go. A year later the six were indeed reduced to four but
we had another TWENTY TWO employed just to feed and look after the
bl**dy thing plus a new £200K building. The four girls all got better
paid but much easier jobs - progress indeed. The best "money spinner"
that we could have wished for. The thing never ran our programme
scheduling that had to go to another site with an even more powerful
(64kb and much more expensive) machine, a trip that provided an "all
nighter" that was very lucrative indeed. DAHIK

Keith

But the ICL 1900 is no more than a re-boxed Ferranti Argus 500. (ICT +
Gov money + Ferranti knowhow = ICL) and for those of you wanting
something to worry about, there are a few nuclear power stations and
also some Cat A prisons still controlled by Ferranti Argus machines
that I looked after 20 years ago!!!

AWEM


Posted by on January 8, 2008, 1:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options
wrote:
>
> But the ICL 1900 is no more than a re-boxed Ferranti Argus 500. (ICT +
> Gov money + Ferranti knowhow = ICL) and for those of you wanting
> something to worry about, there are a few nuclear power stations and
> also some Cat A prisons still controlled by Ferranti Argus machines
> that I looked after 20 years ago!!!
>
> AWEM

I'm not sure that would worry me too much Andrew, better than trusting
MS in it's two latest guises (XP and Vista). Modern components are
causing me to worry as well, I've just had the third new hard disk
fail in as many weeks on install. All "good" makes but when you look
closer they are all Chinese made. I now have to look at the
manufacturer and the country of origin it would seem.

Although I had left by then the ICL was replaced in the early 80's
when the Americans took over the facility and couldn't stop laughing
at our "IT centre". When I returned in the late 80's having been
working with one of the then most powerful mainframes in Europe, I
also had a good laugh at their IBM "ludite" machine that had replaced
it. "What goes round comes................" I guess.

The truth is they don't make them like that anymore and it's a bl***y
good job really :-)

Keith


Posted by Suzy on January 8, 2008, 1:30 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> wrote:
>>
>> But the ICL 1900 is no more than a re-boxed Ferranti Argus 500. (ICT +
>> Gov money + Ferranti knowhow = ICL) and for those of you wanting
>> something to worry about, there are a few nuclear power stations and
>> also some Cat A prisons still controlled by Ferranti Argus machines
>> that I looked after 20 years ago!!!
>>
>> AWEM
>
> I'm not sure that would worry me too much Andrew, better than trusting
> MS in it's two latest guises (XP and Vista). Modern components are
> causing me to worry as well, I've just had the third new hard disk
> fail in as many weeks on install. All "good" makes but when you look
> closer they are all Chinese made. I now have to look at the
> manufacturer and the country of origin it would seem.
>
> Although I had left by then the ICL was replaced in the early 80's
> when the Americans took over the facility and couldn't stop laughing
> at our "IT centre". When I returned in the late 80's having been
> working with one of the then most powerful mainframes in Europe, I
> also had a good laugh at their IBM "ludite" machine that had replaced
> it. "What goes round comes................" I guess.
>
> The truth is they don't make them like that anymore and it's a bl***y
> good job really :-)
>
> Keith
>
FWIW I find XP Home solid as a rock. I wouldn't touch Vista with a bargepole
(nor ever trust Microsoft -- the destroyer of VB -- again)



Posted by Boo on January 8, 2008, 3:18 pm
Please log in for more thread options
> FWIW I find XP Home solid as a rock. I wouldn't touch Vista with a bargepole
> (nor ever trust Microsoft -- the destroyer of VB -- again)

Eh ? Microsoft destroyer of VB ? When did that happen ?

--
Boo

Posted by Suzy on January 8, 2008, 3:49 pm
Please log in for more thread options

>> FWIW I find XP Home solid as a rock. I wouldn't touch Vista with a
>> bargepole (nor ever trust Microsoft -- the destroyer of VB -- again)
>
> Eh ? Microsoft destroyer of VB ? When did that happen ?
>
> --
> Boo

Not sure when. But vb evolved through version 3 to 6 and was always backward
compatible. There are millions of lines of code worldwide using this
platform. Then a few years ago Microsoft produced a version nicknamed
dot.NET which rendered all that work completely useless (although they still
called it "visual basic"). There has been an enormous outcry. More info if
desired



Similar ThreadsPosted
Re: Computer power usage January 6, 2008, 6:56 am
Re: Computer power usage January 6, 2008, 1:19 pm
Power Factor and New Power Company Digi Meters September 28, 2006, 8:20 am
12 volt power supply November 13, 2008, 1:26 pm
BS Bench master power hacksaw August 20, 2006, 3:26 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap