Sievert "Cyclone" torch burners

Model Engineering in UK - Model engineering, metal crafts in UK 

Bookmark this page:  YahooMyWeb Yahoo!  Google Google  Windows Live Favorites Windows Live  del.icio.us del.icio.us  digg digg  Add to Netscape Netscape
Subject Author Date
Sievert "Cyclone" torch burners Christopher Tidy 01-19-2008
Posted by Norman Billingham on January 19, 2008, 5:54 pm
Please log in for more thread options

> Bob Minchin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> To be honest, soft soldering heating pipe does not present much of a
>> challenge to a standard Sievert burner. The cyclone ring of flame is
>> quite helpful working up close to a wall although I still put a piece of
>> sheet metal to protect the plaster.
>> Unless you have a lot of pipes to do, then you might get greater use out
>> of buying two different sized standard burners giving a capability over a
>> wider range of jobs.
>
> I already have two of the standard burners and one "precision" burner. I
> was just wondering if the "Cyclone" was so extraordinary as to make it a
> "must have" :-).


The cyclone burner has another advantage. Since it pulls in its air much
further back from the burner, it can be used in more confined spaces before
it goes out becasue of oxygen starvation - e.g. working well inside a model
loco boiler or firebox. Its other advantage is better fuel-gas mixing,
Disadvantages - it's more noisy and the torch head gets a lot hotter - can
glow red sometimes.

I have both a cyclone and two conventional burners and the cyclone is the
one that gets far the most use. I'd rate it as a "must have", though it
obviously depends on what kind of work you do.




Posted by Christopher Tidy on January 19, 2008, 6:37 pm
Please log in for more thread options
Norman Billingham wrote:
>
>>Bob Minchin wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>To be honest, soft soldering heating pipe does not present much of a
>>>challenge to a standard Sievert burner. The cyclone ring of flame is
>>>quite helpful working up close to a wall although I still put a piece of
>>>sheet metal to protect the plaster.
>>>Unless you have a lot of pipes to do, then you might get greater use out
>>>of buying two different sized standard burners giving a capability over a
>>>wider range of jobs.
>>
>>I already have two of the standard burners and one "precision" burner. I
>>was just wondering if the "Cyclone" was so extraordinary as to make it a
>>"must have" :-).
>
>
>
> The cyclone burner has another advantage. Since it pulls in its air much
> further back from the burner, it can be used in more confined spaces before
> it goes out becasue of oxygen starvation - e.g. working well inside a model
> loco boiler or firebox. Its other advantage is better fuel-gas mixing,
> Disadvantages - it's more noisy and the torch head gets a lot hotter - can
> glow red sometimes.
>
> I have both a cyclone and two conventional burners and the cyclone is the
> one that gets far the most use. I'd rate it as a "must have", though it
> obviously depends on what kind of work you do.

Thanks for the opinion.

Best wishes,

Chris


Posted by Tony Jeffree on January 19, 2008, 7:10 pm
Please log in for more thread options
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:54:39 -0000, "Norman Billingham"
<norman.at.tumulus.org.uk> wrote:

>I have both a cyclone and two conventional burners

Anti-cyclones? <G>

Regards,
Tony

Similar ThreadsPosted
Hot air gun / blow torch March 20, 2008, 5:17 pm

Contact Us | Privacy Policy

XML SitemapXML Sitemap